Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30555773›Full record

ArticleCurrent epidemiology reports2018

Using machine learning to identify health outcomes from electronic health record data.

Jenna Wong, Mara Murray Horwitz, Li Zhou, Sengwee Toh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current epidemiology reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jenna WongDepartment of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA.
Mara Murray HorwitzDepartment of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA.
Li ZhouDivision of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Sengwee TohDepartment of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA.

Funding

Encoding and Processing Patient Allergy Information in EHRsR01HS022728 · AHRQ · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI ZHOU, LI · 2013 to 2016
$2.0M
Improving Allergy Documentation and Clinical Decision Support in the EHRR01HS025375 · AHRQ · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI ZHOU, LI · 2018 to 2021
$1.6M
Privacy-protecting distributed analysis of biomedical big dataU01EB023683 · NIBIB · HARVARD PILGRIM HEALTH CARE, INC. · PI TOH, DARREN · 2016 to 2018
$1.4M
NLP to Improve Accuracy and Quality of Dictated Medical DocumentsR01HS024264 · AHRQ · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI ZHOU, LI · 2015 to 2017
$750k
AHRQ HHS R01 HS022728AHRQ HHS R01 HS024264AHRQ HHS R01 HS025375NIBIB NIH HHS U01 EB023683
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewElectronic health records (EHRs) contain valuable data for identifying health outcomes, but these data also present numerous challenges when creating computable phenotyping algorithms. Machine learning methods could help with some of these challenges. In this review, we discuss four common scenarios that researchers may find helpful for thinking critically about when and for what tasks machine learning may be used to identify health outcomes from EHR data. RECENT

findingsWe first consider the conditions in which machine learning may be especially useful with respect to two dimensions of a health outcome: 1) the characteristics of its diagnostic criteria, and 2) the format in which its diagnostic data are usually stored within EHR systems. In the first dimension, we propose that for health outcomes with diagnostic criteria involving many clinical factors, vague definitions, or subjective interpretations, machine learning may be useful for modeling the complex diagnostic decision-making process from a vector of clinical inputs to identify individuals with the health outcome. In the second dimension, we propose that for health outcomes where diagnostic information is largely stored in unstructured formats such as free text or images, machine learning may be useful for extracting and structuring this information as part of a natural language processing system or an image recognition task. We then consider these two dimensions jointly to define four common scenarios of health outcomes. For each scenario, we discuss the potential uses for machine learning - first assuming accurate and complete EHR data and then relaxing these assumptions to accommodate the limitations of real-world EHR systems. We illustrate these four scenarios using concrete examples and describe how recent studies have used machine learning to identify these health outcomes from EHR data. SUMMARY: Machine learning has great potential to improve the accuracy and efficiency of health outcome identification from EHR systems, especially under certain conditions. To promote the use of machine learning in EHR-based phenotyping tasks, future work should prioritize efforts to increase the transportability of machine learning algorithms for use in multi-site settings.

Indexed as

cohort identificationelectronic health recordshealth outcomesmachine learningphenotyping

Identifiers

PMID30555773
PMCPMC6289196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.