Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30555748›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2018

Patients with RAS wild-type right-sided unresectable liver-confined mCRC also benefit from cetuximab plus chemotherapy in first-line treatment.

Peng Zheng, Li Ren, Qingyang Feng, Dexiang Zhu, Wenju Chang, Guodong He, Meiling Ji, Mi Jian, Qi Lin, Tuo Yi and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of cancer research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Peng ZhengDepartment of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Li RenDepartment of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Qingyang FengDepartment of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Dexiang ZhuDepartment of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Wenju ChangDepartment of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Guodong HeDepartment of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Meiling JiDepartment of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Mi JianDepartment of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Qi LinDepartment of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Tuo YiDepartment of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Ye WeiDepartment of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Jianmin XuDepartment of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Fudan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Growing evidence indicates that primary tumor location of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) can affect response to specific therapy. This study aimed to assess the impact of primary tumor location on efficacy of cetuximab in Chinese patients with mCRC. We included patients with RAS wild-type liver-limited mCRC treated with first-line cetuximab plus chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone between June 2008 and December 2016. All patients were categorized as having left-sided tumors or right-sided tumors. Progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR) and conversion rate of surgery for liver metastases was analyzed according to tumor location and treatment. Right-sided tumors were characterized with larger primary tumor, poorer differentiation, more lymph node metastases and larger and more liver metastases. For patients with left-sided tumors (N=233), addition of cetuximab to chemotherapy significantly improved ORR (68.9% vs. 30.6%, OR=5.01, P < 0.001), conversion rate of liver surgery (33.5% vs. 10.8%, OR=4.18, P < 0.001), PFS (12.1 months vs. 6.1 months, HR=0.42, P < 0.001), and OS (not evaluable vs. 23.1 months, HR=0.31, P < 0.001). Among patients with right-sided tumors (N=85), cetuximab plus chemotherapy, compared with chemotherapy alone, also significantly improved ORR (56.8% vs. 29.3%, OR=3.18, P=0.010), PFS (9.3 months vs. 5.1 months, OR=0.57, P=0.012) and OS (25.3 months vs. 16.8 months, HR=0.56, P=0.032) but conversion rate of liver surgery (20.5% vs. 9.8%, HR=2.38, P=0.171). Our results demonstrated differential effect of cetuximab on efficacy outcomes based on tumor sidedness. Also, we found that patients with right-sided tumors also benefit from cetuximab plus chemotherapy but not as great as left-sided tumors and in general, did worse. In conclusion, findings of previous studies about differential effect of anti-EGFR therapy based on tumor sidedness are applicable to an Asian population.

Indexed as

cetuximabColorectal liver metastasespredictive markerprimary tumor location

Identifiers

PMID30555748
PMCPMC6291650
OpenAlexW2997217869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.