Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30555730›Full record

ArticlePsychology of violence2018

Coercive Control in Intimate Partner Violence: Relationship with Women's Experience of Violence, Use of Violence, and Danger.

Melissa E Dichter, Kristie A Thomas, Paul Crits-Christoph, Shannon N Ogden, Karin V Rhodes

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychology of violence, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The psychological impact on mothers who have experienced domestic violence when navigating the family court system: a scoping review.Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Melissa E DichterCenter for Health Equity Research and Promotion, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania.
Kristie A ThomasSchool of Social Work, Simmons College.
Paul Crits-ChristophDepartment of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania.
Shannon N OgdenDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania.
Karin V RhodesNorthwell Health Solutions, Office of Population Health Management, Hofstra Northwell Medical School.
University of Pennsylvania · USDepartment of Veterans Affairs · AUNorthwell Health · USSimmons University · US

Funding

An RCT of Brief Intervention for Problem Drinking and Partner ViolenceR01AA018705 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI CRITS-CHRISTOPH, PAUL F · 2010 to 2014
$2.5M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA018705
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of this study was to better understand the experience of coercive control as a type of IPV by examining associations between coercive control and women's experiences of particular forms of violence, use of violence, and risk of future violence.

methodAs part of a larger research study, data were collected from 553 women patients at two hospital emergency departments who had experienced recent IPV and unhealthy drinking. Baseline assessments, including measures of coercive control, danger, and experience and use of psychological, physical, and sexual forms of IPV in the prior three months were analyzed.

resultsWomen experiencing coercive control reported higher frequency of each form of IPV, and higher levels of danger, compared to women IPV survivors who were not experiencing coercive control. There was no statistically significant association between experience of coercive control and women's use of psychological or sexual IPV; women who experienced coercive control were more likely to report using physical IPV than women who were not experiencing coercive control.

conclusionsFindings contribute to knowledge on the relationship between coercive control and specific forms of violence against intimate partners. A primary contribution is the identification that women who experience coercive control may also use violence, indicating that a woman's use of violence does not necessarily mean that she is not also experiencing severe and dangerous violence as well as coercive control. In fact, experience of coercive control may increase victims' use of physical violence as a survival strategy.

Indexed as

BatteringCoercive ControlDomestic ViolenceIntimate Partner ViolenceUse of Violence

Identifiers

PMID30555730
PMCPMC6291212
OpenAlexW2784327323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.