Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30555706›Full record

ArticleNew microbes and new infections2019

E Angelakis, D Bachar, M Yasir, D Musso, F Djossou, B Gaborit, S Brah, A Diallo, G M Ndombe, O Mediannikov and 10 more

RetractedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in New microbes and new infections, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 63 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Microorganisms · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

E AngelakisAix-Marseille Université, IRD, APHM, VITROME, IHU Méditerranée Infection, France.
D BacharAix-Marseille Université, IRD, APHM, VITROME, IHU Méditerranée Infection, France.
M YasirSpecial Infectious Agents Unit, King Fahd Medical Research Center, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
D MussoUnit of Emerging Infectious Diseases, Institut Louis Malardé, Tahiti, French Polynesia.
F DjossouCentre Hospitalier de Cayenne Andree Rosemon, Cayenne, French Guiana.
B GaboritDepartment of Endocrinology, Metabolic Diseases and Nutrition, CHU Nord, Marseille, France.
S BrahService de Médecine Interne et Générale, Niger.
A DialloAix-Marseille Université, IRD, APHM, VITROME, IHU Méditerranée Infection, France.
G M NdombeLaboratoire national de santé publique, Brazzaville, République populaire du Congo.
O MediannikovAix-Marseille Université, IRD, APHM, MEPHI, IHU Méditerranée Infection, France.
C RobertAix-Marseille Université, IRD, APHM, VITROME, IHU Méditerranée Infection, France.
E I AzharSpecial Infectious Agents Unit, King Fahd Medical Research Center, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
F BibiSpecial Infectious Agents Unit, King Fahd Medical Research Center, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
N S NsanaLaboratoire national de santé publique, Brazzaville, République populaire du Congo.
H-J ParraLaboratoire national de santé publique, Brazzaville, République populaire du Congo.
J AkianaLaboratoire national de santé publique, Brazzaville, République populaire du Congo.
C SokhnaAix-Marseille Université, IRD, APHM, VITROME, IHU Méditerranée Infection, France.
B DavoustAix-Marseille Université, IRD, APHM, VITROME, IHU Méditerranée Infection, France.
A DutourDepartment of Endocrinology, Metabolic Diseases and Nutrition, CHU Nord, Marseille, France.
D RaoultAix-Marseille Université, IRD, APHM, MEPHI, IHU Méditerranée Infection, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a significant gap in our knowledge of the microbe-host relationship between urban and traditional rural populations. We conducted a large-scale study to examine the gut microbiota of different traditional rural and urban lifestyles in human populations. Using high-throughput 16S ribosomal RNA gene amplicon sequencing, we tested urban French, Saudi, Senegalese, Nigerian and Polynesian individuals as well as individuals living in traditional rural societies, including Amazonians from French Guiana, Congolese Pygmies, Saudi Bedouins and Algerian Tuaregs. The gut microbiota from individuals living in traditional rural settings clustered differently and presented significantly higher diversity than those of urban populations (p 0.01). The bacterial taxa identified by class analysis as contributing most significantly to each cluster were

Indexed as

Geographygut microbiotametagenomicsprobioticstraditional livingtreponema

Identifiers

PMID30555706
PMCPMC6276622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.