Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30555619›Full record

ReviewThe World Allergy Organization journal2018

Skin as an immune organ and clinical applications of skin-based immunotherapy.

J Andrew Bird, Mario Sánchez-Borges, Ignacio J Ansotegui, Motohiro Ebisawa, José Antonio Ortega Martell

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The World Allergy Organization journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Allergens in Atopic Dermatitis.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. AIT: New Avenues in Allergen Immunotherapy.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

J Andrew Bird1Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX 75390-9063 USA.
Mario Sánchez-Borges2Centro Médico Docente La Trinidad and Clinica El Avila, Caracas, Venezuela.
Ignacio J AnsoteguiHospital Quironsalud Bizkaia, Bilbao, Spain.
Motohiro Ebisawa4Sagamihara National Hospital, Sagamihara, Kanagawa Japan.
José Antonio Ortega Martell5Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo, Pachuca, Hidalgo Mexico.
Centro Médico Docente La Trinidad · VEHospital Quirónsalud Barcelona · ESNational Sagamihara Hospital · JPThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USUniversidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prevalence of food allergy is increasing, and allergen avoidance continues to be the main standard of care. There is a critical need for safe and effective forms of immunotherapy for patients with food allergy as well as other allergic diseases.

findingsThe skin is a multifunctional organ with unique immunologic properties, making it a favorable administration route for allergen-specific immunotherapy. Epicutaneous immunotherapy (EPIT) takes advantage of the skin's immune properties to modulate allergic responses and is thus one of the allergen-specific immunotherapy approaches currently being investigated for food allergy. Advances made in the understanding of how epicutaneously applied proteins interact with the immune system and in the technology for facilitating such interactions offer many opportunities for clinical application. Research has shown that allergen delivered to intact skin via EPIT is taken up in the superficial layers of the skin by Langerhans cells, avoiding passive movement of allergen through the dermis and limiting systemic circulation. EPIT brings about allergen desensitization by activating a population of regulatory T cells (Tregs) with unique properties and the potential for inducing a sustained effect as well as the possibility (seen in animal models) for protection against further sensitizations. Several clinical trials investigating the therapeutic efficacy of EPIT for treatment of peanut allergy have been completed, as well as a Phase 2 trial for treatment of milk allergy.

conclusionsTaken together, the reviewed literature supports the concept that EPIT activates the natural desensitization pathway of the skin, offering a progressive, possibly sustained response. EPIT offers a potential alternative for allergen immunotherapy that is less invasive and carries a lower risk for systemic reactions than oral immunotherapy.

Indexed as

Allergen immunotherapyEpicutaneous immunotherapyFood allergySkin

Identifiers

PMID30555619
PMCPMC6284278
OpenAlexW2900740291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.