Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30555575›Full record

ArticleTheranostics2018

Use of a pre-vascularised oral mucosal cell sheet for promoting cutaneous burn wound healing.

Jaewang Lee, Daiha Shin, Jong-Lyel Roh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Theranostics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Development of fibroblast/endothelial cell-seeded collagen scaffolds for in vitro prevascularization.Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Effect of Angiogenesis in Bone Tissue Engineering.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Vascularization strategies in tissue engineering approaches for soft tissue repair.Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2021
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jaewang LeeDepartment of Otolaryngology, Asan Medical Institute of Convergence Science and Technology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Daiha ShinDepartment of Otolaryngology, Asan Medical Institute of Convergence Science and Technology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jong-Lyel RohDepartment of Otolaryngology, Asan Medical Institute of Convergence Science and Technology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Asan Medical Center · KRUniversity of Ulsan · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pre-vascularised cell sheets have been used to promote early angiogenesis and graft survival. However, the use of pre-vascularised mucosal cell sheets for burn wounds has been rarely evaluated. Therefore, we examined the applicability of an oral pre-vascularised mucosal cell sheet that we had previously developed for the treatment of cutaneous burn wounds.

Indexed as

Wound HealingAnimalsBlood CellsBurnsDisease Models, AnimalEndothelial Progenitor CellsFibroblastsGene Expression ProfilingHistocytochemistryKeratinocytesMouth MucosaRatsSkin TransplantationTissue EngineeringTreatment Outcomecell sheetoral mucosapre-vascularisationSkinwound healing

Identifiers

PMID30555575
PMCPMC6276302
OpenAlexW2903491601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.