Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30555516›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in genetics2018

Buffering and Amplifying Transcriptional Noise During Cell Fate Specification.

Elizabeth A Urban, Robert J Johnston

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Roles of P-body factors inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Analysis of developmental gene expression using smFISH andbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Transcriptional priming and chromatin regulation during stochastic cell fate specification.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  19. Contributions of transcriptional noise to leukaemia evolution: KAT2A as a case-study.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  20. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Elizabeth A UrbanDepartment of Biology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Robert J JohnstonDepartment of Biology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.

Funding

CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGYT32GM007231 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI VAN DOREN, MARK B · 1985 to 2020
$18.4M
Mechanisms controlling stochastic gene expression during eye developmentR01EY025598 · NEI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Robert John Johnston · 2015 to 2026
$4.9M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY025598NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007231
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The molecular processes that drive gene transcription are inherently noisy. This noise often manifests in the form of transcriptional bursts, producing fluctuations in gene activity over time. During cell fate specification, this noise is often buffered to ensure reproducible developmental outcomes. However, sometimes noise is utilized as a "bet-hedging" mechanism to diversify functional roles across a population of cells. Studies of bacteria, yeast, and cultured cells have provided insights into the nature and roles of noise in transcription, yet we are only beginning to understand the mechanisms by which noise influences the development of multicellular organisms. Here we discuss the sources of transcriptional noise and the mechanisms that either buffer noise to drive reproducible fate choices or amplify noise to randomly specify fates.

Indexed as

cell fateexpression noiseMS2 hairpinsmFISHtranscriptional burstingWaddington landscape

Identifiers

PMID30555516
PMCPMC6282114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.