ReviewFrontiers in immunology2018
Novel Strategies for Malaria Vaccine Design.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed.
- PfCSP-ferritin nanoparticle malaria vaccine antigen formulated with aluminum-salt and CpG 1018® adjuvants: Preformulation characterization, antigen-adjuvant interactions, and mouse immunogenicity studies.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025Article
- Article
- Gut microbiota influencesNew microbes and new infections · 2025Article
- Search continues: Exploring immunoinformatics platforms for designing an effective multiepitope malaria vaccine candidate.Biotechnologia · 2025Article
- Recent Advances in the Treatment of Malaria.Pharmaceutics · 2024Review
- Exploring malaria parasite surface proteins to devise highly immunogenic multi-epitope subunit vaccine for Plasmodium falciparum.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2024Article
- Estimation of PfRh5-based vaccine efficacy in asymptomaticFrontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- Malaria vaccine-related adverse events among children under 5 in sub-Saharan Africa: systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.BMJ open · 2023Article
- Malaria Genomics, Vaccine Development, and Microbiome.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- A Review of Major Patents on Potential Malaria Vaccine Targets.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Bioassay-Guided Fractionation with Antimalarial and Antimicrobial Activities ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Stochastic expression of invasion genes in Plasmodium falciparum schizonts.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Impact of chemoprophylaxis immunisation under halofantrine (CPS-HF) drug cover in Plasmodium yoelii Swiss mice malaria model.Folia parasitologica · 2022Article
- Review
- Screening Novel Vaccine Candidates forFrontiers in immunology · 2022Article
- Perturbations in the T cell receptor β repertoire during malaria infection in children: A preliminary study.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Article
- Vesicular stomatitis virus-based vaccine targeting plasmodium blood-stage antigens elicits immune response and protects against malaria with protein booster strategy.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Review of the Current Landscape of the Potential of Nanotechnology for Future Malaria Diagnosis, Treatment, and Vaccination Strategies.Pharmaceutics · 2021Review
- Article
- Functional Food for the Stimulation of the Immune System Against Malaria.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The quest for a licensed effective vaccine against malaria remains a global priority. Even though classical vaccine design strategies have been successful for some viral and bacterial pathogens, little success has been achieved for
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.