ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2018
Multi-Component Herbal Products in the Prevention and Treatment of Chemotherapy-Associated Toxicity and Side Effects: A Review on Experimental and Clinical Evidences.
Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
66 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 148 citations in OpenAlex.
- Drug-herb combination therapy in cancer management.Molecular biology reports · 2022Pooled it
- Comprehensive Evaluation of Traditional Herbal Medicine Combined With Adjuvant Chemotherapy on Post-Surgical Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Integrative cancer therapiesPooled it
- L-theanine from Camellia sinensis (L.) attenuates 3-NP-induced Huntington's disease-like alterations by remedying behavioral patterns and modulating neurotransmitters across three distinct brain regions: evidence from in-vivo and in-silico approaches.Metabolic brain disease · 2026Article
- Doxorubicin-loaded chitosan/gold nanoparticles enhance anticancer effects and reduce CLMAT3 and ZNRD1-AS1 expression in colorectal cancer cells.BMC cancer · 2026Article
- Review
- Progress in the antitumor molecular mechanisms of Isorhamnetin.Discover oncology · 2025Review
- Potential of Traditional Chinese MedicineNutrients · 2025Review
- Research Advances of the Effects of Food and Medicine Homology Substances on Gastric Cancer.Cancer medicine · 2025Review
- Unveiling the anticancer potential of Curcuma amada rhizome extract against prostate cancer through computational and experimental approaches.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Nanotechnology in oncology: advances in biosynthesis, drug delivery, and theranostics.Discover oncology · 2025Review
- Cancer chemoprevention: signaling pathways and strategic approaches.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025Review
- Article
- The improvement effect and mechanism of traditional Chinese medicine on chemotherapy-induced diarrhea: a systematic review.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Integrative approaches in Alzheimer's disease: evaluating the potential of traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine (TCIM).Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Use of spheroids as a model to evaluate the anticancer action of animal venoms and derived molecules: 2010-2024 review.The journal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases · 2025Review
- Network pharmacology combined with molecular docking and experimental validation of the mechanism of action of columbianetin acetate in the treatment of ovarian cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Article
- Non-clinical safety assessment ofToxicological research · 2024Article
- Network pharmacology study to explore the multiple molecular mechanism of SH003 in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2024Article
- Anti-tumoral Immunity and Chemo-preventive Effectiveness of Herbal Extracts of Curcumin, Ginger, Clove and Amygdaline in Ehrlich Ascites Carcinoma-Challenging Mice.Anti-cancer agents in medicinal chemistry · 2024Article
6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chemotherapy is nowadays the main treatment of human cancers. Chemotherapeutic agents target rapidly dividing cancer cells to suppress tumor progression, however, their non-specific cytotoxicity often leads to significant side effects that might be intolerable to cancer patients. Multi-component herbal products have been used for thousands of years for the treatment of multiple human diseases. This study aims to systematically summarize and evaluate the experimental and clinical evidences of the efficacy of multi-component herbal products in improving chemotherapy-induced side effect. Literature was retrieved from PubMed database and evaluated based on the side effects described. Multi-component herbal products were found to be effective in ameliorating the neurotoxicity, gastrointestinal toxicity, hematological toxicity, cardiotoxicity, hepatotoxicity and nephrotoxicity. Both experimental and clinical evidences were found, indicating the potential of applying multicomponent herbal products in the clinical treatment of chemotherapy-induced side effects. However, the lack of mechanistic and pharmacokinetic studies, inconsistency in product quality, as well as insufficient clinical evidence suggested that more investigations are urgently necessary. In all, our review shed light on the potential of using multi-component herbal products in the clinical management of chemotherapy-induced toxicity and side effects. We also discussed the potential threats of natural products for cancer treatment and compared the advantages of using herbs to conventional chemical drugs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.