ArticleEuropean heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology2018
Repetitive levosimendan treatment in the management of advanced heart failure.
Article in European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03437226 (Repetitive Levosimendan Infusion for Patients With Advanced Chronic Heart Failure), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Repetitive Levosimendan Infusion for Patients With Advanced Chronic Heart Failure
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prophylactic use of levosimendan in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial.Critical care (London, England) · 2019Trial
- Advanced heart failure: from definitions to therapeutic options.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023Article
- Advanced heart failure: guideline-directed medical therapy, diuretics, inotropes, and palliative care.ESC heart failure · 2022Review
- Review
- Levosimendan Efficacy and Safety: 20 Years of SIMDAX in Clinical Use.Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology · 2020Review
- Pulsed Levosimendan in advanced heart failure due to congenital heart disease: a case series.European heart journal. Case reports · 2020Article
- Short-term treatments for acute cardiac care: inotropes and inodilators.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2020Article
- Levosimendan Efficacy and Safety: 20 years of SIMDAX in Clinical Use.Cardiac failure review · 2020Review
- Levosimendan in the light of the results of the recent randomized controlled trials: an expert opinion paper.Critical care (London, England) · 2019Review
- Why has positive inotropy failed in chronic heart failure? Lessons from prior inotrope trials.European journal of heart failure · 2019Review
- Treating Patients Following Hospitalisation for Acute Decompensated Heart Failure: An Insight into Reducing Early Rehospitalisations.Cardiac failure review · 2019Review
- Use of levosimendan in acute and advanced heart failure: short review on available real-world data.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 9 institutions in 7 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inotropes may be an appropriate treatment for patients with advanced heart failure (AdHF) who remain highly symptomatic despite optimized standard therapies. Objectives for inotrope use in these situations include relief of symptoms and improvement of quality of life, and reduction in unplanned hospitalizations and the costs associated with such episodes. All of these goals must be attained without compromising survival. Encouraging findings with intermittent cycles of intravenous levosimendan have emerged from a range of exploratory studies and from three larger controlled trials (LevoRep, LION-HEART, and LAICA) which offered some evidence of clinical advantage. In these settings, however, obtaining statistically robust data may prove elusive due to the difficulties of endpoint assessment in a complex medical condition with varying presentation and trajectory. Adoption of a composite clinical endpoint evaluated in a hierarchical manner may offer a workable solution to this problem. Such an instrument can explore the proposition that repetitive administration of levosimendan early in the period after discharge from an acute episode of worsening heart failure may be associated with greater subsequent clinical stability vis-à-vis standard therapy. The use of this methodology to develop a 'stability score' for each patient means that all participants in such a trial contribute to the overall outcome analysis through one or more of the hierarchical endpoints; this has helpful practical implications for the number of patients needed and the length of follow-up required to generate endpoint data. The LeoDOR study (NCT03437226), outlined in this review, has been designed to explore this new approach to outcome assessment in AdHF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.