Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30555229›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nanomedicine2018

Liposomal drug delivery in an in vitro 3D bone marrow model for multiple myeloma.

Maaike Vj Braham, Anil K Deshantri, Monique C Minnema, F Cumhur Öner, Raymond M Schiffelers, Marcel Ham Fens, Jacqueline Alblas

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nanomedicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Recent advances in targeted drug delivery systems for multiple myeloma.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. A synthetic human 3DiScience · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. A 3D-Bioprinted Multiple Myeloma Model.Advanced healthcare materials · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Maaike Vj BrahamDepartment of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands, j.alblas@umcutrecht.nl.
Anil K DeshantriDepartment of Clinical Chemistry and Haematology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Monique C MinnemaDepartment of Hematology, University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
F Cumhur ÖnerDepartment of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands, j.alblas@umcutrecht.nl.
Raymond M SchiffelersDepartment of Clinical Chemistry and Haematology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Marcel Ham FensDepartment of Clinical Chemistry and Haematology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Jacqueline AlblasDepartment of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands, j.alblas@umcutrecht.nl.
Utrecht University · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLiposomal drug delivery can improve the therapeutic index of treatments for multiple myeloma. However, an appropriate 3D model for the in vitro evaluation of liposomal drug delivery is lacking. In this study, we applied a previously developed 3D bone marrow (BM) myeloma model to examine liposomal drug therapy. MATERIAL AND

methodsLiposomes of different sizes (~75-200 nm) were tested in a 3D BM myeloma model, based on multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells, endothelial progenitor cells, and myeloma cells cocultured in hydrogel. The behavior and efficacy of liposomal drug therapy was investigated, evaluating the feasibility of testing liposomal drug delivery in 3D in vitro. Intracellular uptake of untargeted and integrin α

resultsLiposomes (~75-110 nm) passively diffused throughout the heterogeneously porous (~80-850 nm) 3D hydrogel model after insertion. Cellular uptake of liposomes was observed and was increased by targeting very late antigen-4. Liposomal bortezomib and doxorubicin showed increased cytotoxic effects toward myeloma cells compared with the free drugs, using either a cell line or primary myeloma cells. Cytotoxicity toward supporting BM cells was reduced using liposomes.

conclusionThe 3D model allows the study of liposome-encapsulated molecules on multiple myeloma and supporting BM cells, looking at cellular targeting, and general efficacy of the given therapy. The advantages of liposomal drug delivery were demonstrated in a primary myeloma model, enabling the study of patient-to-patient responses to potential drugs and treatment regimes.

Indexed as

Drug Delivery SystemsModels, BiologicalAntibiotics, AntineoplasticBone MarrowCell ProliferationDoxorubicinHumansIn Vitro TechniquesLiposomesMultiple MyelomaTumor Cells, CulturedAntibiotics, AntineoplasticDoxorubicinLiposomesdrug sensitivity and resistance testingliposomesmultiple myelomatargeted deliverytumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID30555229
PMCPMC6278842
OpenAlexW2902849569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.