Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30555210›Full record

ArticleJournal of materials research2018

Structure-Property Relationships for 3D printed PEEK Intervertebral Lumbar Cages Produced using Fused Filament Fabrication.

Cemile Basgul, Tony Yu, Daniel W MacDonald, Ryan Siskey, Michele Marcolongo, Steven M Kurtz

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of materials research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06782711 (Efficacy and Safety of Customized Skull Implants Made of Polyetheretheretherketone Using Three-dimensional Printing in Patients Undergoing Cranioplasty), which is not on this map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06782711 naenrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy and Safety of Customized Skull Implants Made of Polyetheretheretherketone Using Three-dimensional Printing in Patients Undergoing Cranioplasty

TypeinterventionalSponsorCIMET SCIENTIFIC CORPORATIONRan2025 to 2026Enrolled30ConditionsCranial DefectsArmscranioplasty, customized skull implants made of polyetheretheretherketone (PEEK) using 3D printing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cemile BasgulImplant Research Center, School of Biomedical Engineering, Science and Health Systems, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA.
Tony YuMaterials Science and Engineering, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA.
Daniel W MacDonaldImplant Research Center, School of Biomedical Engineering, Science and Health Systems, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA.
Ryan SiskeyImplant Research Center, School of Biomedical Engineering, Science and Health Systems, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA.
Michele MarcolongoMaterials Science and Engineering, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA.
Steven M KurtzImplant Research Center, School of Biomedical Engineering, Science and Health Systems, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA.

Funding

Preventing Spinal Infection: Ultrasound Triggered ProphylaxisR01AR069119 · NIAMS · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI Flemming Forsberg, Noreen J Hickok · 2016 to 2026
$3.2M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR069119
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in additive manufacturing technology now enable fused filament fabrication (FFF) of Polyetheretherketone (PEEK). A standardized lumbar fusion cage design was 3D printed with different speeds of the print head nozzle to investigate whether 3D printed PEEK cages exhibit sufficient material properties for lumbar fusion applications. It was observed that the compressive and shear strength of the 3D printed cages were 63-71% of the machined cages, whereas the torsion strength was 92%. Printing speed is an important printing parameter for 3D printed PEEK, which resulted in up to 20% porosity at the highest speed of 3000 mm/min, leading to reduced cage strength. Printing speeds below 1500 mm/min can be chosen as the optimal printing speed for this printer to reduce the printing time while maintaining strength. The crystallinity of printed PEEK did not differ significantly from as-machined PEEK cages from extruded rods, indicating that the processing provides similar microstructure.

Identifiers

PMID30555210
PMCPMC6289530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.