Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30555190›Full record

ArticleJournal of public economics2018

Prescription Drug Use under Medicare Part D: A Linear Model of Nonlinear Budget Sets.

Jason Abaluck, Jonathan Gruber, Ashley Swanson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of public economics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Time Aggregation in Health Insurance Deductibles.American economic journal. Economic policy · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Insurance coverage, long-term care utilization, and health outcomes.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Secret Menu in Health Care: A Cash Market for Imaging in California.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jason AbaluckYale and NBER.
Jonathan GruberMIT and NBER.
Ashley SwansonUniversity of Pennsylvania and NBER.

Funding

Dynamics of Plan Choice and Prescription Drug Utilization in Medicare Part DR01AG031270 · NIA · NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH · PI GRUBER, JONATHAN · 2008 to 2015
$2.4M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG031270
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medicare Part D enrollees face a complicated decision: they dynamically choose prescription drug consumption in each period given difficult-to-find prices and a non-linear budget set. We use Part D claims data to estimate a flexible model of consumption that accounts for non-linear prices, dynamic responses, and salience. We use reduced form price responses from a linear regression of consumption on coverage range prices to compare performance under several models of behavior. We find small price elasticities, substantial myopia, and that salient characteristics impact consumption beyond their effect on prices. A hyperbolic discounting model with salience fits the data best.

Indexed as

MedicareMoral hazardnonlinear budget setsprescription drugssalience

Identifiers

PMID30555190
PMCPMC6292523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.