Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30554975›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of preventive medicine2019

Patient-Reported Needs Following a Referral for Colorectal Cancer Screening.

Karen E Dyer, Deirdre A Shires, Susan A Flocke, Sarah T Hawley, Resa M Jones, Ken Resnicow, Yongyun Shin, Jennifer Elston Lafata

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of preventive medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Shared Decision Making in Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Scoping Review.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Karen E DyerVA HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California. Electronic address: karen.dyer@va.gov.
Deirdre A ShiresSchool of Social Work, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan; Center for Health Policy and Health Services Research, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan.
Susan A FlockeCenter for Community Health Integration, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.
Sarah T HawleyDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan; VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Resa M JonesDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health System, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Ken ResnicowUniversity of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan; University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Yongyun ShinDepartment of Biostatistics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia.
Jennifer Elston LafataCenter for Health Policy and Health Services Research, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan; UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

Funding

e-Assist: A Post-Visit Patient Portal Tool to Promote Colorectal Cancer ScreeningR01CA197205 · NCI · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI ELSTON LAFATA, JENNIFER M · 2015 to 2019
$3.0M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA197205
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPatient-physician communication about colorectal cancer screening can affect screening use, but discussions often lack information that patients need for informed decision making and seldom address personal preferences or barriers. To address this gap, a series of patient focus groups was conducted to guide the development of an online, interactive decision support program. This article presents findings on patient information needs and barriers to colorectal cancer screening after receiving a screening recommendation from a physician, and their perspectives on using electronic patient portals as platforms for health-related decision support.

methodsPrimary care patients with recent colonoscopy or stool testing orders were identified via the centralized data repository of a large Midwestern health system. Seven gender-stratified focus groups (N=45 participants) were convened between April and July 2016. Sessions were audio recorded, transcribed, coded, and analyzed for commonly expressed themes beginning in August 2016.

resultsFindings reveal a consistent need for simple and clear information on colorectal cancer screening. Participants desired step-by-step explanations of the colonoscopy procedure and information about bowel preparation options/alternatives. The desired level of additional information varied: some patients wanted to know about and act on test options, whereas others preferred following their physician-recommended testing path. Fears and concerns were prevalent, particularly about colonoscopy, and patients reported challenges getting these concerns and their informational needs addressed. Finally, they expressed consistent support for using the patient portal to gather additional information from their physician.

conclusionsPatient portals may offer an opportunity to build sustainable programs for decision support and assistance that are integrated with clinic workflows and processes.

Indexed as

AgedColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsCommunicationDecision Making, OrganizationalDecision Support TechniquesEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHealth Services Needs and DemandHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedOccult BloodPatient Acceptance of Health CarePatient Education as Topic

Identifiers

PMID30554975
PMCPMC6438715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.