Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30554553›Full record

ArticleJournal of feline medicine and surgery2019

Antibody response to feline panleukopenia virus vaccination in cats with asymptomatic retrovirus infections: a pilot study.

Michèle Bergmann, Stephanie Schwertler, Stephanie Speck, Uwe Truyen, Katrin Hartmann

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of feline medicine and surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michèle BergmannClinic of Small Animal Medicine, Centre for Clinical Veterinary Medicine, LMU, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8856-3849
Stephanie SchwertlerClinic of Small Animal Medicine, Centre for Clinical Veterinary Medicine, LMU, Munich, Germany.
Stephanie SpeckInstitute of Animal Hygiene and Veterinary Public Health, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Uwe TruyenInstitute of Animal Hygiene and Veterinary Public Health, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Katrin HartmannClinic of Small Animal Medicine, Centre for Clinical Veterinary Medicine, LMU, Munich, Germany.
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DELeipzig University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesCurrently, there are only a few studies on how immunocompromised cats, such as cats infected with feline leukaemia virus (FeLV) and feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV), respond to vaccination. Therefore, this study measured feline panleukopenia virus (FPV) antibodies in retrovirus-infected cats within a period of 28 days after FPV vaccination, and compared the immune response to that of non-infected cats.

methodsEight asymptomatic retrovirus-infected cats (four FeLV, four FIV), and non-infected age-matched control cats (n = 67) were vaccinated with a commercial FPV modified live virus (MLV). Pre- and post-vaccination antibody titres were measured by haemagglutination inhibition (HI) on days 0, 7 and 28. An HI titre ⩾1:40 was defined as protective. An adequate response to vaccination was defined as a four-fold titre increase or higher. Comparison of the immune response of retrovirus-infected and non-infected cats was performed.

resultsPre-vaccination FPV antibody titres ⩾1:40 were present in 100% (n = 8/8; 95% confidence interval [CI] 62.8-100) of retrovirus-infected and in 77.6% (n = 52/67; 95% CI 66.2-86.0) of non-infected cats. An adequate response to vaccination (titre increase ⩾four-fold) was seen in 1/8 retrovirus-infected cats (12.5%; 95% CI 0.1-49.2) compared with 22/67 non-infected cats (32.8%; 95% CI 22.8-44.8). In cats with high pre-vaccination titres (⩾1:160), a four-fold titre increase or higher was observed in 1/8 retrovirus infected cats (12.5%; 95% CI 0.1-49.2) compared with 4/42 non-infected cats (9.5%; 95% CI 3.2-22.6). None of the eight retrovirus-infected cats developed illness or vaccination side effects after vaccination with MLV against FPV within the 28 days. There were no significant differences between groups: for pre-vaccination titres; for at least four-fold titre increases following vaccination in either all cats or the cats with high pre-vaccination titres; and concerning adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: All retrovirus-infected asymptomatic cats had pre-vaccination FPV antibodies indicating protection against panleukopenia. Response of retrovirus-infected cats to vaccination was similar to the response of non-infected cats.

Indexed as

Antibody FormationAnimalsAntibodies, ViralAsymptomatic InfectionsCatsFeline PanleukopeniaFeline Panleukopenia VirusFemaleHemagglutination Inhibition TestsMalePilot ProjectsRetroviridae InfectionsVaccinationViral VaccinesAntibodies, ViralViral Vaccinesactive immunisationFeLVFIVFPVimmunosuppressionprotection

Identifiers

PMID30554553
PMCPMC10814277
OpenAlexW2904275481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.