ArticleWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2018
Biotechnological potential of bacteria isolated from cattle environments of desert soils in Sonora Mexico.
Article in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- NativeFrontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this research was to study the hydrolytic potential of bacteria isolated from cattle environments of two desert soils in one of the driest and hottest zones in America. A total of 26 points were sampled, 144 strains were isolated, and 50 strains were selected for the characterization of esterase, lipase, protease, and amylase activities and for 16S rRNA identification. Strains of the Bacillus, Pseudomonas, Acinetobacter, Enterobacter, Providencia, Escherichia, and Pantoea genera were identified. Comparisons of the proteolytic activity of the secretome from 14 strains (Bacillus n = 7, Escherichia n = 2; Providencia, Pseudomonas, Enterobacter, Pantoea and Acinetobacter n = 1) were performed. Four strains of Bacillus showed the highest proteolytic activity. These strains were characterized through a comparative analysis of pH and temperature as well as the effects of salt concentration on protease activity. Maximum proteolytic activity occurred in the range of pH 7-9 and temperatures between 50 and 70 °C for B. subtilis WD01, B. tequilensis WS11, B. tequilensis WS13, and B. tequilensis WS14. At a 20% NaCl concentration, the proteolytic activity retained was 71.4%, 65%, and 79.8% for WD01, WS11, and WS13, respectively; the activity of strain WS14 increased with 45% NaCl. Protease production by B. tequilensis WS14 with wheat, fish, and bone flours as low-cost substrates showed no differences between bone and fish flours and showed a decrease in protease production with wheat flour. The proteolytic activity in flour extracts with 20% NaCl was 82%, 75.61% and 38.04% for fish, bone and wheat flours, respectively. Data obtained in this work allow us to propose that strains isolated from environments with extreme conditions have a biotechnological potential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.