Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30554323›Full record

ArticleCurrent microbiology2019

Illumina MiSeq Sequencing Investigation of Microbiota in Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid and Cecum of the Swine Infected with PRRSV.

Nan Jiang, Huan Liu, Peng Wang, Jing Huang, Hui Han, Qinfu Wang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Lung microbiota of raccoon dogs (Frontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Metagenomic sequencing reveals swine lung microbial communities and metagenome-assembled genomes associated with lung lesions-a pilot study.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Sialidase ofInfection and immunity · 2021
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nan JiangInstitute of Immunology, College of Life Science and Technology, Dalian University, Dalian, 116622, Liaoning, China.
Huan LiuInstitute of Immunology, College of Life Science and Technology, Dalian University, Dalian, 116622, Liaoning, China.
Peng WangInstitute of Immunology, College of Life Science and Technology, Dalian University, Dalian, 116622, Liaoning, China.
Jing HuangInstitute of Immunology, College of Life Science and Technology, Dalian University, Dalian, 116622, Liaoning, China.
Hui HanInstitute of Immunology, College of Life Science and Technology, Dalian University, Dalian, 116622, Liaoning, China.
Qinfu WangInstitute of Immunology, College of Life Science and Technology, Dalian University, Dalian, 116622, Liaoning, China. qinfuwang@126.com.
Dalian University · CN

Funding

the Dalian Science and Technological Project under Grant No. 2014B11NC096the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 81172777
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) causes significant animal morbidity and mortality and economic losses worldwide. In this study, we analyzed the microbiota in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BAL), mucosa, and feces in cecum of the PRRSV-challenged pigs using the Illumina MiSeq sequencing platform, to investigate the role of microbiota in the pathogenesis and development of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS). Quantitative insights into microbial ecology analyses indicated that the dominant bacterial groups in the lung from the PRRSV-challenged pigs were Haemophilus parasuis and Mycoplasma hyorhinis, with a relative abundance of 35-48% and 27-41%, respectively. Our results were consistent with the clinical observation that the PRRSV-infected pigs are always co-infected with other bacteria, such as Haemophilus and Mycoplasma. On the other hand, Campylobacter and Clostridium became the two most abundant bacteria in the mucosal and luminal microbiota of the cecum of the PRRSV-challenged pigs, and the relative abundance was four times higher than that in the healthy pigs. This suggested that Campylobacter and Clostridium might be associated with the pathogenesis of diarrhea in PRRS. Linear discriminant analysis effect size reveals significant microbial dysbiosis of BAL, mucosa, and feces in cecum of the PRRSV-challenged pigs. We have identified a structural imbalance of the microbiota, characterized by a reduced diversity of microbiota and abundance alterations of certain bacteria in the PRRSV-challenged pigs. The observed microbiota dysbiosis in this study provides insight into the roles of the microbiota in the complications of the PRRSV infection.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, ViralBacteriaBronchoalveolar Lavage FluidCecumCoinfectionDysbiosisFecesHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingLungMicrobiotaMucous MembranePorcine Reproductive and Respiratory SyndromePorcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome virusSwineAntibodies, Viral

Identifiers

PMID30554323
OpenAlexW2903911201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.