Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30554284›Full record

ReviewTechniques in coloproctology2018

Consensus Statement of the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR): management and treatment of complete rectal prolapse.

G Gallo, J Martellucci, G Pellino, R Ghiselli, A Infantino, F Pucciani, M Trompetto

Abstract readConsensus StatementReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Techniques in coloproctology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. 2025 Delphi consensus on robotic ventral mesh rectopexy.International journal of colorectal disease · 2025
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Surgical approaches for complete rectal prolapse.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

G GalloDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Santa Rita Clinic, Vercelli, Italy.
J MartellucciDepartment of General, Emergency and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.
G PellinoDepartment of Medical, Surgical, Neurological, Metabolic and Ageing Sciences, Unit of General Surgery, Università della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
R GhiselliDepartment of General Surgery, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
A InfantinoDepartment of Surgery, Santa Maria dei Battuti Hospital, San Vito al Tagliamento, Pordenone, Italy.
F PuccianiDepartment of Surgery and Translational Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
M TrompettoDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Santa Rita Clinic, Vercelli, Italy. trompetto.mario@libero.it.
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · ITFerrarotto Hospital · ITMagna Graecia University · ITMarche Polytechnic University · ITUniversity of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · ITUniversity of Florence · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rectal prolapse, rectal procidentia, "complete" prolapse or "third-degree" prolapse is the full-thickness prolapse of the rectal wall through the anal canal and has a significant impact on quality of life. The incidence of rectal prolapse has been estimated to be approximately 2.5 per 100,000 inhabitants with a clear predominance among elderly women. The aim of this consensus statement was to provide evidence-based data to allow an individualized and appropriate management and treatment of complete rectal prolapse. The strategy used to search for evidence was based on application of electronic sources such as MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Review Library, CINAHL and EMBASE. The recommendations were defined and graded based on the current levels of evidence and in accordance with the criteria adopted by the American College of Gastroenterology's Chronic Constipation Task Force. Five evidence levels were defined. The recommendations were graded A, B, and C.

Indexed as

Advisory CommitteesAgedColorectal SurgeryDigestive System Surgical ProceduresDisease ManagementFemaleHumansIncidenceItalyMiddle AgedRectal ProlapseSocieties, MedicalAbdominal approachExternal rectal prolapseNon-operative managementPerineal approachRectal procidentiaSurgical treatment

Identifiers

PMID30554284
OpenAlexW2905424521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.