Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30553414›Full record

ArticleJournal of safety research2018

Gender differences in children's pedestrian behaviors: Developmental effects.

Huarong Wang, David C Schwebel, Dingliang Tan, Licheng Shi, Lvqing Miao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of safety research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Measurement of the Burden of Road Injuries in Colombia, 1990-2021.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Roles of individual differences and traffic environment factors on children's street-crossing behaviour in a VR environment.Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Huarong WangDepartment of Psychology, Institute of Nautical Medicine, Nantong University, 9 Seyuan Road, Nantong 226019, China. Electronic address: yeluo801004@163.com.
David C SchwebelDepartment of Psychology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1300 University Blvd, CH 415, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA.
Dingliang TanSchool of Education Science, Nanjing Normal University, 122 Ninghai Road, Nanjing 210097, China.
Licheng ShiDepartment of Psychology, Institute of Nautical Medicine, Nantong University, 9 Seyuan Road, Nantong 226019, China.
Lvqing MiaoDepartment of Psychology, Institute of Nautical Medicine, Nantong University, 9 Seyuan Road, Nantong 226019, China.
Nantong University · CNNanjing Normal University · CNUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

Virtual Reality by Mobile Phone: Improving Child Pedestrian SafetyR01HD088415 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI SCHWEBEL, DAVID C · 2016 to 2021
$2.8M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD088415
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAll child pedestrians are vulnerable to road traffic injuries, but there is evidence that boys may be at greater risk than girls, at least among some age groups.

methodTo create effective intervention programs, research on how boys and girls of particular ages behave as pedestrians, and whether there are gender differences that increase risk for particular genders at particular ages, is needed. In this study, 255 boys and 235 girls in grade 1 through 6 from two primary schools in Nantong city, China, were unobtrusively videotaped when walking to school in the morning. Videotapes were reviewed and coded for seven pedestrian safety behaviors, including activities related to crossing streets (walking instead of running/hopping, observing traffic, using the crosswalk instead of walking outside the crosswalk, and keeping close to an accompanying adult) and those related to walking alongside busy streets (walking instead of running/hopping on the sidewalk, not playing on the sidewalk, walking alone instead of walking side-by-side with a partner).

resultsResults revealed that as a whole, boys played on the sidewalk more often than girls (p < 0.01) and crossed with an accompanying adult more than girls (p < 0.05), while girls walked side-by-side with partners more often than boys (p < 0.05). With a few exceptions, boys and girls in the younger grades (1-2) as well as those in the older grades (5-6) behaved fairly similarly as pedestrians, but boys and girls in the middle grades (3-4) presented with several significant gender-based differences. In the middle grades, boys watched traffic more than girls while crossing (p < 0.01); ran, hopped and played on the sidewalk more often than girls (p < 0.05); and walked side-by-side less often with partners than girls (p < 0.05). We also detected different gender-based trends in the development of pedestrian skills. With increasing age, girls performed more safely in pedestrian tasks, but boys did not show a similar developmental trend.

conclusionsWe conclude that boys and girls exhibit different characteristics in their pedestrian behaviors and discuss implications for prevention.

Indexed as

Child BehaviorAge FactorsChildChinaCitiesFemaleHumansMalePedestriansSafetySex FactorsChildrenGenderNaturalistic observationPedestrian behaviorRoad-crossing behavior

Identifiers

PMID30553414
PMCPMC6296240
OpenAlexW2890929619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.