Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30553120›Full record

Trial reportSocial science & medicine (1982)2019

'There is no point giving cash to women who don't spend it the way they are told to spend it' - Exploring women's agency over cash in a combined participatory women's groups and cash transfer programme to improve low birthweight in rural Nepal.

Lu Gram, Jolene Skordis-Worrall, Naomi Saville, Dharma S Manandhar, Neha Sharma, Joanna Morrison

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Social science & medicine (1982), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Unconditional cash transfers to low-income preterm infants and their families: a pilot randomized controlled trial.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lu GramInstitute for Global Health, University College London, 30 Guilford Street, WC1N 1EH, United Kingdom. Electronic address: lu.gram.13@ucl.ac.uk.
Jolene Skordis-WorrallInstitute for Global Health, University College London, 30 Guilford Street, WC1N 1EH, United Kingdom. Electronic address: j.skordis-worrall@ucl.ac.uk.
Naomi SavilleInstitute for Global Health, University College London, 30 Guilford Street, WC1N 1EH, United Kingdom. Electronic address: n.saville@ucl.ac.uk.
Dharma S ManandharMother Infant Research Activities, YB Bhawan, Thapathali, Kathmandu, 921, Nepal. Electronic address: dsm@mira.org.np.
Neha SharmaMother Infant Research Activities, YB Bhawan, Thapathali, Kathmandu, 921, Nepal. Electronic address: neha.sharma@mira.org.np.
Joanna MorrisonInstitute for Global Health, University College London, 30 Guilford Street, WC1N 1EH, United Kingdom. Electronic address: joanna.morrison@ucl.ac.uk.

Funding

Medical Research Council G81174H
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cash transfer programmes form an integral part of nutrition, health, and social protection policies worldwide, but the mechanisms through which they achieve their health and nutritional impacts are incompletely understood. We present results from a process evaluation of a combined participatory women's groups and cash transfer programme to improve low birth weight in rural Nepal. We explored the ways in which context, implementation, and mechanism of the intervention affected beneficiary women's agency over cash transfers. Informed by a grounded theory framework, we conducted and analysed semi-structured interviews with 22 beneficiary women, 15 of their mothers-in-law, 3 of their elder sisters-in-law and 20 husbands, as well as a focus group discussion with 7 supervisors of the women's group intervention. Our study reveals how women's group facilitators, their supervisors and community members developed a shared dynamic around persuading and compelling recipients of unconditional cash transfers into spending them according to criteria developed by the group. We found these dynamics effectively constituted 'soft conditions' on beneficiary spending which restricted women's ability to make decisions over their cash transfers, but also increased their likelihood of spending them on their own pregnancy. Our findings demonstrate the importance of understanding how programmes are implemented and responded to in order to understand their implications for beneficiary agency and empowerment.

Indexed as

Program EvaluationRural PopulationAdultFamilyFemaleFocus GroupsFood AssistanceGrounded TheoryHumansInfant, Low Birth WeightInfant, NewbornInterviews as TopicMaternal HealthNepalPregnancyWomenAgencyCash transfersGenderMaternal healthNepalNewborn healthParticipatory learning and actionProcess evaluation

Identifiers

PMID30553120
PMCPMC6327149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.