Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30552549›Full record

ArticleNeuroinformatics2019

Automatic Thalamus Segmentation on Unenhanced 3D T1 Weighted Images: Comparison of Publicly Available Segmentation Methods in a Pediatric Population.

Salem Hannoun, Rayyan Tutunji, Maria El Homsi, Stephanie Saaybi, Roula Hourani

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroinformatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Salem HannounAbu-Haidar Neuroscience Institute, Faculty of medicine, American University of Beirut, Riad El-Solh, Beirut, 1107 2020, Lebanon.ORCID 0000-0002-5982-3242
Rayyan TutunjiDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Riad El-Solh, P.O.Box: 11-0236, Beirut, 1107 2020, Lebanon.
Maria El HomsiDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Riad El-Solh, P.O.Box: 11-0236, Beirut, 1107 2020, Lebanon.
Stephanie SaaybiDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Riad El-Solh, P.O.Box: 11-0236, Beirut, 1107 2020, Lebanon.
Roula HouraniDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Riad El-Solh, P.O.Box: 11-0236, Beirut, 1107 2020, Lebanon. rh64@aub.edu.lb.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The anatomical structure of the thalamus renders its segmentation on 3DT1 images harder due to its low tissue contrast, and not well-defined boundaries. We aimed to investigate the differences in the precision of publicly available segmentation techniques on 3DT1 images acquired at 1.5 T and 3 T machines compared to the thalamic manual segmentation in a pediatric population. Sixty-eight subjects were recruited between the ages of one and 18 years. Manual segmentation of the thalamus was done by three junior raters, and then corrected by an experienced rater. Automated segmentation was then performed with FSL Anat, FIRST, FreeSurfer, MRICloud, and volBrain. A mask of the intersections between the manual and automated segmentation was created for each algorithm to measure the degree of similitude (DICE) with the manual segmentation. The DICE score was shown to be highest using volBrain in all subjects (0.873 ± 0.036), as well as in the 1.5 T (0.871 ± 0.037), and the 3 T (0.875 ± 0.036) groups. FSL-Anat and FIRST came in second and third. MRICloud was shown to have the lowest DICE values. When comparing 1.5 T to 3 T groups, no significant differences were observed in all segmentation methods, except for FIRST (p = 0.038). Age was not a significant predictor of DICE in any of the measurements. When using automated segmentation, the best option in both field strengths would be the use of volBrain. This will achieve results closest to the manual segmentation while reducing the amount of time and computing power needed by researchers.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalInfantMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeuroimagingThalamusMagnetic resonance imagingManual and automated segmentationPediatric imagingSimilarity indexThalamus

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.