Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30552443›Full record

ArticleMicrobial ecology2019

Floral and Foliar Source Affect the Bee Nest Microbial Community.

Jason A Rothman, Corey Andrikopoulos, Diana Cox-Foster, Quinn S McFrederick

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial ecology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
11.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Do amino and fatty acid profiles of pollen provisions correlate with bacterial microbiomes in the mason beePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jason A RothmanGraduate Program in Microbiology, University of California, 900 University Ave., Riverside, CA, 92521, USA.
Corey AndrikopoulosDepartment of Biology, Utah State University, UMC5310, Logan, UT, 84322, USA.
Diana Cox-FosterDepartment of Biology, Utah State University, UMC5310, Logan, UT, 84322, USA. Diana.Cox-Foster@ars.usda.gov.
Quinn S McFrederickGraduate Program in Microbiology, University of California, 900 University Ave., Riverside, CA, 92521, USA. quinnmc@ucr.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0740-6954
University of California, Riverside · USUtah State University · US

Funding

National Aeronautics and Space Administration NNX15AP99ANational Institute of Food and Agriculture 2018-67011-28123National Institute of Food and Agriculture CA-R-ENT-5109-H
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Managed pollinators such as the alfalfa leafcutting bee, Megachile rotundata, are essential to the production of a wide variety of agricultural crops. These pollinators encounter a diverse array of microbes when foraging for food and nest-building materials on various plants. To test the hypothesis that food and nest-building source affects the composition of the bee-nest microbiome, we exposed M. rotundata adults to treatments that varied both floral and foliar source in a 2 × 2 factorial design. We used 16S rRNA gene and internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequencing to capture the bacterial and fungal diversity of the bee nests. We found that nest microbial communities were significantly different between treatments, indicating that bee nests become inoculated with environmentally derived microbes. We did not find evidence of interactions between the fungi and bacteria within our samples. Furthermore, both the bacterial and fungal communities were quite diverse and contained numerous exact sequence variants (ESVs) of known plant and bee pathogens that differed based on treatment. Our research indicates that bees deposit plant-associated microbes into their nests, including multiple plant pathogens such as smut fungi and bacteria that cause blight and wilt. The presence of plant pathogens in larval pollen provisions highlights the potential for bee nests to act as disease reservoirs across seasons. We therefore suggest that future research should investigate the ability of bees to transmit pathogens from nest to host plant.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaAnimalsBacteriaBeesFungiLarvaMedicago sativaPhylogenyPollenPollinationRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16S rRNA gene sequencingITS sequencingMicrobial communitiesSolitary bees

Identifiers

PMID30552443
OpenAlexW2904214840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.