Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30552283›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2018

Understanding cauda equina syndrome: protocol for a UK multicentre prospective observational cohort study.

Julie Woodfield, Ingrid Hoeritzauer, Aimun A B Jamjoom, Savva Pronin, Nisaharan Srikandarajah, Michael Poon, Holly Roy, Andreas K Demetriades, Philip Sell, Niall Eames and 2 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Julie WoodfieldDepartment for Clinical Neurosciences, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3645-500X
Ingrid HoeritzauerDepartment for Clinical Neurosciences, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK.
Aimun A B JamjoomCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Savva ProninCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Nisaharan SrikandarajahDepartment of Neurosurgery, Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Michael PoonDepartment for Clinical Neurosciences, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK.
Holly RoySouth West Neurosurgery Centre, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, UK.
Andreas K DemetriadesDepartment for Clinical Neurosciences, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK.
Philip SellCentre for Spinal Studies and Surgery, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.
Niall EamesDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, UK.
Patrick F X StathamDepartment for Clinical Neurosciences, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK.
British Neurosurgical Trainee Research Collaborative (BNTRC)

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCauda equina syndrome (CES) is a potentially devastating condition caused by compression of the cauda equina nerve roots. This can result in bowel, bladder and sexual dysfunction plus lower limb weakness, numbness and pain. CES occurs infrequently, but has serious potential morbidity and medicolegal consequences. This study aims to identify and describe the presentation and management of patients with CES in the UK. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Understanding Cauda Equina Syndrome (UCES) is a prospective and collaborative multicentre cohort study of adult patients with confirmed CES managed at specialist spinal centres in the UK. Participants will be identified using neurosurgical and orthopaedic trainee networks to screen referrals to spinal centres. Details of presentation, investigations, management and service usage will be recorded. Both patient-reported and clinician-reported outcome measures will be assessed for 1 year after surgery. This will establish the incidence of CES, current investigation and management practices, and adherence to national standards of care. Outcomes will be stratified by clinical presentation and patient management. Accurate and up to date information about the presentation, management and outcome of patients with CES will inform standards of service design and delivery for this important but infrequent condition. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: UCES received a favourable ethical opinion from the South East Scotland Research Ethics Committee 02 (Reference: 18/SS/0047; IRAS ID: 233515). All spinal centres managing patients with CES in the UK will be encouraged to participate in UCES. Study results will be published in medical journals and shared with local participating sites. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN16828522; Pre-results.

Indexed as

Cauda Equina SyndromeAdolescentChildGuideline AdherenceHumansIncidenceInterdisciplinary CommunicationMulticenter Studies as TopicNeurosurgical ProceduresObservational Studies as TopicOrthopedic ProceduresOutcome Assessment, Health CareProspective StudiesStandard of CareTreatment OutcomeUnited Kingdomcauda equina syndromecohort studyoutcomesspinal surgery

Identifiers

PMID30552283
PMCPMC6303568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.