Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30552277›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2018

Supported self-management for people with type 2 diabetes: a meta-review of quantitative systematic reviews.

Mireille Captieux, Gemma Pearce, Hannah L Parke, Eleni Epiphaniou, Sarah Wild, Stephanie J C Taylor, Hilary Pinnock

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04616053 (A Randomised Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Effectiveness of a Multidisciplinary Team Intervention on Glycaemic Control for Disadvantaged Type 2 Diabetes Patients in France.), which is not on this map. Cited by 80 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
80citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04616053 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

A Randomised Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Effectiveness of a Multidisciplinary Team Intervention on Glycaemic Control for Disadvantaged Type 2 Diabetes Patients in France.

TypeinterventionalSponsorPole de Sante Chambery NordRan2021 to 2024Enrolled140ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2ArmsIMPACT intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

80 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Education programmes for people with chronic kidney disease and diabetes.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Indigenous application of self-management: A concept analysis.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mireille CaptieuxUsher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4367-9274
Gemma PearceCoventry University, Centre for Advances in Behavioural Science, Coventry, UK.
Hannah L ParkeUniversity of Exeter Biomedical Informatics Hub, Exeter, Devon, UK.
Eleni EpiphaniouUniversity of Nicosia, Department of Social Sciences, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Sarah WildUsher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Stephanie J C TaylorCentre for Primary Care and Public Health, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Hilary PinnockUsher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Funding

Chief Scientist OfficeDepartment of Health 11/1014/04
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesSelf-management support aims to give people with chronic disease confidence to actively manage their disease, in partnership with their healthcare provider. A meta-review can inform policy-makers and healthcare managers about the effectiveness of self-management support strategies for people with type 2 diabetes, and which interventions work best and for whom.

designA meta-review of systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) was performed adapting Cochrane methodology. SETTING AND

participantsEight databases were searched for systematic reviews of RCTs from January 1993 to October 2016, with a pre-publication update in April 2017. Forward citation was performed on included reviews in Institute for Scientific Information (ISI) Proceedings. We extracted data and assessed quality with the Revised-Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (R-AMSTAR). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Glycaemic control as measured by glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) was the primary outcome. Body mass Index, lipid profiles, blood pressure and quality of life scoring were secondary outcomes. Meta-analyses reporting HbA1c were summarised in meta-forest plots; other outcomes were synthesised narratively.

results41 systematic reviews incorporating data from 459 unique RCTs in diverse socio-economic and ethnic communities across 33 countries were included. R-AMSTAR quality score ranged from 20 to 42 (maximum 44). Apart from one outlier, the majority of reviews found an HbA1c improvement between 0.2% and 0.6% (2.2-6.5 mmol/mol) at 6 months post-intervention, but attenuated at 12 and 24 months. Impact on secondary outcomes was inconsistent and generally non-significant. Diverse self-management support strategies were employed; no single approach appeared optimally effective (or ineffective). Effective programmes tended to be multi-component and provide adequate contact time (>10 hours). Technology-facilitated self-management support showed a similar impact as traditional approaches (HbA1c MD -0.21% to -0.6%).

conclusionsSelf-management interventions using a range of approaches improve short-term glycaemic control in people with type 2 diabetes including culturally diverse populations. These findings can inform researchers, policy-makers and healthcare professionals re-evaluating the provision of self-management support in routine care. Further research should consider implementation and sustainability.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Patient Care TeamSelf-ManagementBlood PressureBody Mass IndexCulturally Competent CareGlycated HemoglobinHealth BehaviorHumansLipidsQuality of LifeSelf EfficacySystematic Reviews as TopicGlycated Hemoglobinhemoglobin A1c protein, humanLipidshealth policymeta-reviewprimary carequality In health careSupported Self-management

Identifiers

PMID30552277
PMCPMC6303627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.