ArticleBMJ open2018
Exploring patient safety in Swedish specialised home healthcare: an interview study with multidisciplinary teams and clinical managers.
Article in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Patient safety in wound care: experiences of healthcare professionals in home healthcare settings.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2026Article
- Quality and Safety Management of Advanced Medical Technologies in Homecare in The Netherlands: A Qualitative Study on Consensus Development Regarding Approaches and Continuing Professional Education.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Factors supporting resilient performance and mental well-being among health care professionals in home care settings: a qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Article
- Ambulance clinicians' perspectives on interprofessional collaboration in prehospital emergency care for older patients with complex care needs: a mixed-methods study.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
- Feasibility of prospective error reporting in home palliative care: A mixed methods study.Palliative medicine · 2025Article
- The need for acute assessments in home healthcare - Swedish registered nurses' experiences.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2024Article
- Article
- Exploring homecare leaders' risk perception and the link to resilience and adaptive capacity: a multiple case study.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Older Persons' and Health Care Professionals' Design Choices When Co-Designing a Medication Plan Aiming to Promote Patient Safety: Case Study.JMIR aging · 2023Article
- Teamwork in home care nursing: A scoping literature review.Health & social care in the community · 2022Article
- Article
- Barriers to efficient management of in-home care: A qualitative content analysis.Nursing open · 2022Article
- Maneuvering the care puzzle: Experiences of participation in care by frail older persons with significant care needs living at home.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2021Article
- Identifying no-harm incidents in home healthcare: a cohort study using trigger tool methodology.BMC health services research · 2020Article
- Exploring challenges in quality and safety work in nursing homes and home care - a case study as basis for theory development.BMC health services research · 2020Article
- Controlling the Uncontrollable: Patient Safety and Medication Management From the Perspective of Registered Nurses in Municipal Home Health Care.Global qualitative nursing researchArticle
- Home Care Nurses at the Heart of the Communication Web: Communication Synchronicity and Effects on the Psychosocial Work Environment.Global qualitative nursing researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveHome healthcare is the fastest growing arena in the healthcare system but patient safety research in this context is limited. The aim was to explore how patient safety in Swedish specialised home healthcare is described and adressed from multidisciplinary teams' and clinical managers' perspectives.
designAn explorative qualitative study.
settingMultidisciplinary teams and clinical managers were recruited from three specialised home healthcare organisations in Sweden.
methodsNine focus group interviews with multidisciplinary teams and six individual interviews with clinical managers were conducted, in total 51 participants. The data were transcribed verbatim and analysed using qualitative content analysis.
resultsPatient safety was inherent in the well-established care ideology which shaped a common mindset between members in the multidisciplinary teams and clinical managers. This patient safety culture was challenged by the emerging complexity in which priority had to be given to standardised guidelines, quality assessments and management of information in maladapted communication systems and demands for required competence and skills. The multiple guidelines and quality assessments that aimed to promote patient safety from a macro-perspective, constrained the freedom, on a meso-level and micro-level, to adapt to challenges based on the care ideology.
conclusionPatient safety in home healthcare is dependent on adaptability at the management level; the team members' ability to adapt to the varying conditions and on patients being capable of adjusting their homes and behaviours to reduce safety risks. A strong culture related to a patient's value as a person where patients' and families' active participation and preferences guide the decisions, could be both a facilitator and a barrier to patient safety, depending on which value is given highest priority.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.