Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30552197›Full record

ArticlePlant physiology2019

Genome-Scale Fluxome of

John I Hendry, Saratram Gopalakrishnan, Justin Ungerer, Himadri B Pakrasi, Yinjie J Tang, Costas D Maranas

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant physiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Cyanobacterial Bioenergetics in Relation to Cellular Growth and Productivity.Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Phosphoglycolate salvage in a chemolithoautotroph using the Calvin cycle.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Improved Salt Tolerance and Metabolomics Analysis ofFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. SNPs deciding the rapid growth of cyanobacteria are alterable.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

John I HendryDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802.
Saratram GopalakrishnanDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802.
Justin UngererDepartment of Biology, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri 63130.
Himadri B PakrasiDepartment of Biology, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri 63130.ORCID 0000-0001-8240-2123
Yinjie J TangDepartment of Energy, Environment, and Chemical Engineering, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri 63130.ORCID 0000-0002-5112-0649
Costas D MaranasDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802 costas@psu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-1508-1398
Pennsylvania State University · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

CarbonCarbon DioxideCarbon IsotopesGenome, BacterialIsotope LabelingModels, BiologicalSynechococcusCarbonCarbon DioxideCarbon Isotopes

Identifiers

PMID30552197
PMCPMC6367904
OpenAlexW2904042263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.