Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30552181›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2019

Effects of Positive and Negative Expectations on Human Pain Perception Engage Separate But Interrelated and Dependently Regulated Cerebral Mechanisms.

Yao-Wei Shih, Hsin-Yun Tsai, Feng-Sheng Lin, Yi-Hsuan Lin, Chun-Yen Chiang, Zheng-Liang Lu, Ming-Tsung Tseng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A review of descending pain modulation in humans.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yao-Wei ShihGraduate Institute of Brain and Mind Sciences, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei 10051, Taiwan.
Hsin-Yun TsaiGraduate Institute of Brain and Mind Sciences, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei 10051, Taiwan.
Feng-Sheng LinDepartment of Anesthesiology, National Taiwan University Hospital, 10002, Taipei, Taiwan, and.
Yi-Hsuan LinGraduate Institute of Brain and Mind Sciences, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei 10051, Taiwan.
Chun-Yen ChiangGraduate Institute of Brain and Mind Sciences, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei 10051, Taiwan.
Zheng-Liang LuDepartment of Computer Science and Information Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, 10617, Taiwan.
Ming-Tsung TsengGraduate Institute of Brain and Mind Sciences, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei 10051, Taiwan, mingtsungtseng@ntu.edu.tw.ORCID 0000-0003-3763-9548

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Expectations substantially influence pain perception, but the relationship between positive and negative expectations remains unclear. Recent evidence indicates that the integration between pain-related expectations and prediction errors is crucial for pain perception, which suggests that aversive prediction error-associated regions, such as the anterior insular cortex (aIC) and rostral anterior cingulate cortex (rACC), may play a pivotal role in expectation-induced pain modulation and help to delineate the relationship between positive and negative expectations. In a stimulus expectancy paradigm combining fMRI in healthy volunteers of both sexes, we found that, although positive and negative expectations respectively engaged the right aIC and right rACC to modulate pain, their associated activations and pain rating changes were significantly correlated. When positive and negative expectations modulated pain, the right aIC and rACC exhibited opposite coupling with periaqueductal gray (PAG) and the mismatch between actual and expected pain respectively modulated their coupling with PAG and thalamus across individuals. Participants' certainty about expectations predicted the extent of pain modulation, with positive expectations involving connectivity between aIC and hippocampus, a region regulating anxiety, and negative expectations engaging connectivity between rACC and lateral orbitofrontal cortex, a region reflecting outcome value and certainty. Interestingly, the strength of these certainty-related connectivities was also significantly associated between positive and negative expectations. These findings suggest that aversive prediction-error-related regions interact with pain-processing circuits to underlie stimulus expectancy effects on pain, with positive and negative expectations engaging dissociable but interrelated neural responses that are dependently regulated by individual certainty about expectations.

Indexed as

Anticipation, PsychologicalPain PerceptionAdultBrainBrain MappingCuesFemaleGyrus CinguliHippocampusHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePainPain MeasurementPeriaqueductal GrayPrefrontal Cortexanterior cingulate cortexexpectationfunctional magnetic resonance imaginginsulapainprediction error

Identifiers

PMID30552181
PMCPMC6381241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.