Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30552156›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2019

Safety and Activity of Sorafenib in Addition to Vinflunine in Post-Platinum Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma (Vinsor): Phase I Trial.

Carl-Henrik Shah, Helle Pappot, Mads Agerbæk, Karin Holmsten, Fredrik Jäderling, Jeffrey Yachnin, Per Grybäck, Hans von der Maase, Anders Ullén

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Landscape of targeted therapies for advanced urothelial carcinoma.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Carl-Henrik ShahDepartment of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden cari-henrik.shah@ki.se.
Helle PappotDepartment of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Mads AgerbækDepartment of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Karin HolmstenDepartment of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden.
Fredrik JäderlingDepartment of Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Sweden.
Jeffrey YachninDepartment of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden.
Per GrybäckDepartment of Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Sweden.
Hans von der MaaseDepartment of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Anders UllénDepartment of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden.
Karolinska University Hospital · SEKarolinska Institutet · SERigshospitalet · DKAarhus University Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

lessons learnedFirst trial to report safety and activity of the microtubule inhibitor vinflunine plus the tyrosine kinase inhibitor sorafenib in post-platinum metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) patients.A recommended phase II dose was identified for the treatment combination of vinflunine plus sorafenib, with main adverse events including fatigue, febrile neutropenia, neutropenia, hypertension, and hyponatremia.An overall response rate of 41% to second-line vinflunine plus sorafenib treatment in patients with platinum-resistant mUC was confirmed.

backgroundPlatinum-progressive metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) is a clinical challenge. The tyrosine kinase inhibitor sorafenib has demonstrated varied activity in mUC. This trial was designed to examine safety and activity of vinflunine plus sorafenib in mUC.

methodsIn addition to standard dose of vinflunine (320 or 280 mg/m

resultsTwenty-two patients (median age 62.5 years) were included. Five patients received vinflunine 320 mg/m

conclusionThe defined recommended phase II dose (RPTD) was vinflunine 280 mg/m

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarboplatinCarcinoma, Transitional CellChemotherapy-Induced Febrile NeutropeniaCisplatinDrug Resistance, NeoplasmFatigueFemaleHumansHypertensionHyponatremiaKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleCarboplatinCisplatinSorafenibVinblastinevinflunine

Identifiers

PMID30552156
PMCPMC6656519
OpenAlexW2905095178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.