Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30551682›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2018

Treatment of Wastewater Using Seaweed: A Review.

Nithiya Arumugam, Shreeshivadasan Chelliapan, Hesam Kamyab, Sathiabama Thirugnana, Norazli Othman, Noor Shawal Nasri

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Eco-Friendly Copper Recovery: Insights to Algal and Agricultural Waste Application.Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation · 2026
    Article
  4. Advances in the GenusPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  5. Enhancing the Biosorption Capacity ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Evaluation of Metal Accumulation inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Freshwater Macroalgae,International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nithiya ArumugamDepartment of Engineering, Razak Faculty of Technology and Informatics, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Jalan Sultan Yahya Petra, Kuala Lumpur 54100, Malaysia. nithiya85.a@gmail.com.
Shreeshivadasan ChelliapanDepartment of Engineering, Razak Faculty of Technology and Informatics, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Jalan Sultan Yahya Petra, Kuala Lumpur 54100, Malaysia. shreeshivadasan.kl@utm.my.ORCID 0000-0002-3580-3351
Hesam KamyabDepartment of Engineering, Razak Faculty of Technology and Informatics, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Jalan Sultan Yahya Petra, Kuala Lumpur 54100, Malaysia. hesam_kamyab@yahoo.com.ORCID 0000-0002-5272-2297
Sathiabama ThirugnanaDepartment of Engineering, Razak Faculty of Technology and Informatics, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Jalan Sultan Yahya Petra, Kuala Lumpur 54100, Malaysia. sathiabama@utm.my.ORCID 0000-0003-3642-9805
Norazli OthmanDepartment of Engineering, Razak Faculty of Technology and Informatics, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Jalan Sultan Yahya Petra, Kuala Lumpur 54100, Malaysia. norazli.kl@utm.my.
Noor Shawal NasriSustainable Waste-To-Wealth, UTM-MPRC Institute for Oil & Gas, Resource Sustainability Research Alliance, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor Bahru, Johor 81310, Malaysia. noorshaw@utm.my.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inadequately treated or untreated wastewater greatly contribute to the release of unwanted toxic contaminants into water bodies. Some of these contaminants are persistent and bioaccumulative, becoming a great concern as they are released into the environment. Despite the abundance of wastewater treatment technologies, the adsorption method overall has proven to be an excellent way to treat wastewater from multiple industry sources. Because of its significant benefits, i.e., easy availability, handling, and higher efficiency with a low cost relative to other treatments, adsorption is opted as the best method to be used. However, biosorption using naturally found seaweeds has been proven to have promising results in removing pollutants, such as dyes from textile, paper, and the printing industry, nitrogen, and phosphorous and phenolic compounds, as well as heavy metals from various sources. Due to its ecofriendly nature together with the availability and inexpensiveness of raw materials, biosorption via seaweed has become an alternative to the existing technologies in removing these pollutants from wastewater effectively. In this article, the use of low-cost adsorbent (seaweed) for the removal of pollutants from wastewater has been reviewed. An extensive table summarises the applicability of seaweed in treating wastewater. Literature reported that the majority of research used simulated wastewater and minor attention has been given to biosorption using seaweed in the treatment of real wastewater.

Indexed as

Waste Disposal, FluidWater PurificationAdsorptionBiodegradation, EnvironmentalIndustrial WasteSeaweedWater Pollutants, ChemicalIndustrial WasteWater Pollutants, Chemicaladsorptionalgaebiosorptionseaweedwastewater

Identifiers

PMID30551682
PMCPMC6313474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.