Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30551636›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2018

Comparing RGB-D Sensors for Close Range Outdoor Agricultural Phenotyping.

Adar Vit, Guy Shani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Stereo Vision for Plant Detection in Dense Scenes.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Study on the detection of water status of tomato (Frontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Banana Pseudostem Width Detection Based on Kinect V2 Depth Sensor.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Adar VitSoftware and Information Systems Engineering, Ben Gurion University, Beer Sheva 84105, Israel. adarv@post.bgu.ac.il.ORCID 0000-0002-4364-686X
Guy ShaniSoftware and Information Systems Engineering, Ben Gurion University, Beer Sheva 84105, Israel. shanigu@bgu.ac.il.ORCID 0000-0003-4131-0382

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phenotyping is the task of measuring plant attributes for analyzing the current state of the plant. In agriculture, phenotyping can be used to make decisions concerning the management of crops, such as the watering policy, or whether to spray for a certain pest. Currently, large scale phenotyping in fields is typically done using manual labor, which is a costly, low throughput process. Researchers often advocate the use of automated systems for phenotyping, relying on the use of sensors for making measurements. The recent rise of low cost, yet reasonably accurate, RGB-D sensors has opened the way for using these sensors in field phenotyping applications. In this paper, we investigate the applicability of four different RGB-D sensors for this task. We conduct an outdoor experiment, measuring plant attribute in various distances and light conditions. Our results show that modern RGB-D sensors, in particular, the Intel D435 sensor, provides a viable tool for close range phenotyping tasks in fields.

Indexed as

Crops, AgriculturalAgricultureAlgorithmsPhenotypeempirical analysisIntel d-435Intel sr300Microsoft KinectOrbbec astra sphenotypingRGB-D sensorssensors in agriculture

Identifiers

PMID30551636
PMCPMC6308665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.