Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30551003›Full record

ReviewThe International journal on drug policy2019

Lacking evidence for the association between frequent urine drug screening and health outcomes of persons on opioid agonist therapy.

Jasmine McEachern, Lauren Adye-White, Kelsey C Priest, Eloise Moss, Lauren Gorfinkel, Evan Wood, Walter Cullen, Jan Klimas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The International journal on drug policy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Do No Harm? Rethinking Urine Drug Screens in Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jasmine McEachernBritish Columbia Centre on Substance Use, 400-1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 2A9, Canada.
Lauren Adye-WhiteBritish Columbia Centre on Substance Use, 400-1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 2A9, Canada.
Kelsey C PriestOregon Health & Science University (OHSU)-Portland State University (PSU) School of Public Health, OHSU, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR 97239, United States; OHSU MD-PhD Program, School of Medicine, OHSU, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR 97239, United States.
Eloise MossDepartment of Medicine, University of British Columbia, St. Paul's Hospital, 608-1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6, Canada.
Lauren GorfinkelBritish Columbia Centre on Substance Use, 400-1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 2A9, Canada.
Evan WoodBritish Columbia Centre on Substance Use, 400-1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 2A9, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, St. Paul's Hospital, 608-1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6, Canada.
Walter CullenSchool of Medicine, University College Dublin, Health Sciences Centre, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Jan KlimasBritish Columbia Centre on Substance Use, 400-1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 2A9, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, St. Paul's Hospital, 608-1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6, Canada; School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Health Sciences Centre, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland. Electronic address: jklimas@cfenet.ubc.ca.

Funding

Mentoring the next generation of addiction clinician scientists while responding to the opioid epidemicR25DA037756 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA · PI FAIRBAIRN, NADIA · 2014 to 2023
$3.6M
Variation in the Use of Opioid Agonist Treatment in HospitalsF30DA044700 · NIDA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI PRIEST, KELSEY CAROLINE · 2017 to 2020
$186k
NIDA NIH HHS F30 DA044700NIDA NIH HHS R25 DA037756
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOpioid agonist therapy (OAT) is a first-line treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD); however, the efficacy and role of urine drug screening (UDS) in OAT has received little research attention. Prior evidence suggests that UDS frequency reflects philosophy and practice context rather than differences in patient characteristics or clinical need. Therefore, we reviewed the literature on the effect of and recommendations for the frequency of UDS on health outcomes for persons with OUD who receive OAT.

methodsWe searched Medline and EMBASE for articles published from 1995-2017. Search results underwent double, independent review with discrepancies resolved through discussion with a third reviewer, when necessary. Additional articles were identified through snowball searching, hand searching (Google Scholar), and expert consultation. The Cochrane tool was used to assess risk of bias.

resultsOf the 60 potentially eligible articles reviewed, only one three-arm randomized open-label trial, comparing weekly and monthly UDS testing with take-home OAT doses, met our inclusion criteria.

conclusionsOur review identified an urgent gap in research evidence underpinning an area of clinical importance and that is routinely reported by patients as an area of concern.

Indexed as

Drug MonitoringHumansMass ScreeningOpioid-Related DisordersSubstance-Related DisordersTreatment OutcomeUrinalysishospitalizationoffice-based opioid treatmentopioid agonist treatmentsubstance-related disordersurinalysisurine drug screening

Identifiers

PMID30551003
PMCPMC6500449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.