Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30550622›Full record

ReviewJournal of gastroenterology and hepatology2019

A review of lifestyle, metabolic risk factors, and blood-based biomarkers for early diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Yuanjie Pang, Michael V Holmes, Zhengming Chen, Christiana Kartsonaki

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Proteomics in pancreatic cancer.Biomarker research · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Theranostic nanoparticles for detection and treatment of pancreatic cancer.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yuanjie PangClinical Trial Service Unit & Epidemiological Studies Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Michael V HolmesClinical Trial Service Unit & Epidemiological Studies Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Zhengming ChenClinical Trial Service Unit & Epidemiological Studies Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Christiana KartsonakiClinical Trial Service Unit & Epidemiological Studies Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Medical Research Council · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/18/23/33512Medical Research Council MC_U137686851Medical Research Council MC_UU_00017/1Medical Research Council MC_UU_12026/2Wellcome Trust 212946/Z/18/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aimed to review the epidemiologic literature examining lifestyle and metabolic risk factors, and blood-based biomarkers including multi-omics (genomics, proteomics, and metabolomics) and to discuss how these predictive markers can inform early diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). A search of the PubMed database was conducted in June 2018 to review epidemiologic studies of (i) lifestyle and metabolic risk factors for PDAC, genome-wide association studies, and risk prediction models incorporating these factors and (ii) blood-based biomarkers for PDAC (conventional diagnostic markers, metabolomics, and proteomics). Prospective cohort studies have reported at least 20 possible risk factors for PDAC, including smoking, heavy alcohol drinking, adiposity, diabetes, and pancreatitis, but the relative risks and population attributable fractions of individual risk factors are small (mostly < 10%). High-throughput technologies have continued to yield promising genetic, metabolic, and protein biomarkers in addition to conventional biomarkers such as carbohydrate antigen 19-9. Nonetheless, most studies have utilized a hospital-based case-control design, and the diagnostic accuracy is low in studies that collected pre-diagnostic samples. Risk prediction models incorporating lifestyle and metabolic factors as well as other clinical parameters have shown good discrimination and calibration. Combination of traditional risk factors, genomics, and blood-based biomarkers can help identify high-risk populations and inform clinical decisions. Multi-omics investigations can provide valuable insights into disease etiology, but prospective cohort studies that collect pre-diagnostic samples and validation in independent studies are warranted.

Indexed as

Life StyleAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalEarly Detection of CancerFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenomicsHumansMaleMetabolic DiseasesMetabolomicsMiddle AgedPancreatic NeoplasmsBiomarkers, Tumorbiomarkersearly diagnosismetabolomicspancreatic ductal adenocarcinomaproteomicsrisk factors

Identifiers

PMID30550622
PMCPMC6378598
OpenAlexW2904939772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.