ArticlePloS one2018
Mechanisms of acquired resistance to afatinib clarified with liquid biopsy.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- A three-gene signature correlated with MAPK/ERK activation characterizes acquired resistance to EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer.Oncology letters · 2026Article
- Rational design of allosteric inhibitors targeting C797S mutant EGFR in NSCLC: an integrative in silico andFrontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Precious Cargo: The Role of Polymeric Nanoparticles in the Delivery of Covalent Drugs.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Therapeutic advances of targeting receptor tyrosine kinases in cancer.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2024Review
- The Evolving Paradigm of Antibody-Drug Conjugates Targeting the ErbB/HER Family of Receptor Tyrosine Kinases.Pharmaceutics · 2024Review
- Synthesis and Preclinical Evaluation of [Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2023Article
- A Short Review on Miniaturized Biosensors for the Detection of Nucleic Acid Biomarkers.Biosensors · 2023Review
- Absence of copy number gain of EGFR: A possible predictive marker of long-term response to afatinib.Cancer science · 2023Observational
- Endobronchial ultrasound-guided re-biopsy of non-small cell lung cancer with acquired resistance after EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment.Thoracic cancer · 2023Article
- The Development of Positron Emission Tomography Tracers for In Vivo Targeting the Kinase Domain of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Integration of liquid biopsy and pharmacogenomics for precision therapy of EGFR mutant and resistant lung cancers.Molecular cancer · 2022Review
- Non-small-cell lung cancer: how to manageDrugs in context · 2022Review
- The Liquid Biopsy for Lung Cancer: State of the Art, Limitations and Future Developments.Cancers · 2021Review
- Using Liposomes to Alleviate the Toxicity of Chelerythrine, a Natural PKC Inhibitor, in Treating Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Advances in targeting acquired resistance mechanisms to epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors.Journal of thoracic disease · 2020Review
- Differential significance of molecular subtypes which were classified into EGFR exon 19 deletion on the first line afatinib monotherapy.BMC cancer · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although mechanisms of acquired resistance to 1st and 3rd generation EGFR-TKI continue to be elucidated, there have been few clinical investigations into the mechanisms of acquired resistance to the 2nd generation EGFR-TKI afatinib. We analyzed data from 20 patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma who acquired resistance to afatinib, including resistance during EGFR-TKI re-challenge. We examined EGFR T790M and C797S mutations, BRAF V600E mutation, and MET amplification with the MBP-QP method and with droplet digital PCR using ctDNA and re-biopsy samples obtained before and after afatinib treatment. Just before afatinib treatment, 15 of the 20 patients were T790M negative and five were positive. Among the T790M negative patients, 40.0% (6/15) became positive at the time of PD under afatinib. In patients positive for T790M, changes in T790M allele frequency were correlated with afatinib treatment efficacy. C797S was not detected in any patients just before afatinib treatment, but it appeared after treatment in three patients, although with very low allele frequency. Two of these three patients, although positive for both C797S and T790M, achieved PR to osimertinib. However, PFS of these patients was somewhat shorter than that of patients positive for T790M only. BRAF V600E was detected in one patient at PD under afatinib. MET amplification was not detected in this study. T790M is associated with acquired resistance to afatinib, as with 1st generation EGFR-TKI, but with somewhat lower frequency. The influence of C797S on resistance to afatinib is less than that of T790M, but C797S might cause shorter PFS under osimertinib.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.