Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30550608›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Mechanisms of acquired resistance to afatinib clarified with liquid biopsy.

Tomomi Nakamura, Chiho Nakashima, Kazutoshi Komiya, Kazuki Kitera, Mitsuharu Hirai, Shinya Kimura, Naoko Aragane

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Therapeutic advances of targeting receptor tyrosine kinases in cancer.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Synthesis and Preclinical Evaluation of [Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tomomi NakamuraDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, Respiratory Medicine and Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Saga, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1943-7352
Chiho NakashimaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, Respiratory Medicine and Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Saga, Japan.
Kazutoshi KomiyaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, Respiratory Medicine and Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Saga, Japan.
Kazuki KiteraARKRAY Inc., Kyoto, Japan.
Mitsuharu HiraiARKRAY Inc., Kyoto, Japan.
Shinya KimuraDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, Respiratory Medicine and Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Saga, Japan.
Naoko AraganeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, Respiratory Medicine and Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Saga, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7428-9068

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although mechanisms of acquired resistance to 1st and 3rd generation EGFR-TKI continue to be elucidated, there have been few clinical investigations into the mechanisms of acquired resistance to the 2nd generation EGFR-TKI afatinib. We analyzed data from 20 patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma who acquired resistance to afatinib, including resistance during EGFR-TKI re-challenge. We examined EGFR T790M and C797S mutations, BRAF V600E mutation, and MET amplification with the MBP-QP method and with droplet digital PCR using ctDNA and re-biopsy samples obtained before and after afatinib treatment. Just before afatinib treatment, 15 of the 20 patients were T790M negative and five were positive. Among the T790M negative patients, 40.0% (6/15) became positive at the time of PD under afatinib. In patients positive for T790M, changes in T790M allele frequency were correlated with afatinib treatment efficacy. C797S was not detected in any patients just before afatinib treatment, but it appeared after treatment in three patients, although with very low allele frequency. Two of these three patients, although positive for both C797S and T790M, achieved PR to osimertinib. However, PFS of these patients was somewhat shorter than that of patients positive for T790M only. BRAF V600E was detected in one patient at PD under afatinib. MET amplification was not detected in this study. T790M is associated with acquired resistance to afatinib, as with 1st generation EGFR-TKI, but with somewhat lower frequency. The influence of C797S on resistance to afatinib is less than that of T790M, but C797S might cause shorter PFS under osimertinib.

Indexed as

AcrylamidesAdenocarcinoma of LungAdultAfatinibAgedAged, 80 and overAniline CompoundsAntineoplastic AgentsCirculating Tumor DNADrug Resistance, NeoplasmErbB ReceptorsFemaleGene FrequencyHumansIndolesLiquid BiopsyAcrylamidesAfatinibAniline CompoundsAntineoplastic AgentsCirculating Tumor DNAEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsIndolesosimertinibPiperazinesProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyrimidines

Identifiers

PMID30550608
PMCPMC6294373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.