Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30550598›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Comparison of classical and transgenic genetic sexing strains of Mediterranean fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) for application of the sterile insect technique.

José S Meza, Ihsan Ul Haq, Marc J B Vreysen, Kostas Bourtzis, Georgios A Kyritsis, Carlos Cáceres

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. The shibireInsect science · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Effect ofInsects · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.

José S MezaInsect Pest Control Laboratory, Joint FAO/IAEA Division of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-5178-419X
Ihsan Ul HaqInsect Pest Control Laboratory, Joint FAO/IAEA Division of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria.
Marc J B VreysenInsect Pest Control Laboratory, Joint FAO/IAEA Division of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria.
Kostas BourtzisInsect Pest Control Laboratory, Joint FAO/IAEA Division of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria.
Georgios A KyritsisInsect Pest Control Laboratory, Joint FAO/IAEA Division of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria.
Carlos CáceresInsect Pest Control Laboratory, Joint FAO/IAEA Division of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria.
International Atomic Energy Agency · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of genetic sexing strains (GSSs) based on classical genetic approaches has revolutionized the application of the sterile insect technique (SIT) against the Mediterranean fruit fly Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Tephritidae). The global use of Mediterranean fruit fly GSS for SIT applications as part of area-wide integrated pest management (AW-IPM) programmes is testimony to their effectiveness. During recent years, transgenic sexing strains (TSSs) have been developed through genetic engineering techniques offering the possibility to produce male-only progeny by introducing female embryonic lethal genes and to increase the efficacy to identify released sterile males by means of the expression of fluorescent transgene markers. Here, we present a comparative analysis of two Mediterranean fruit fly strains: the classical GSS VIENNA 8D53-/Toliman and the transgenic FSEL#32. The strains were compared for production efficiency and quality control indices under semi mass-rearing conditions, response to sterilizing irradiation doses, male mating performance in walk-in field cages, and production cost of male-only pupae. The results showed that, the FSEL #32 TSS had a similar fecundity but a higher production of male-only pupae than the VIENNA 8D53-/Toliman GSS. For some of the quality control parameters tested, such as pupal weight and survival under starvation conditions, the FSEL #32 TSS was inferior to the VIENNA 8D53-/Toliman GSS. Both the transgenic and the classical genetic sexing strains have shown acceptable and similar mating competitiveness when compared with wild males for mating with wild females. The cost production for both strains is similar but the FSEL#32 TSS may potentially be more cost effective at higher production levels. The results are discussed in the context of incorporating the transgenic strain for SIT application.

Indexed as

Animals, Genetically ModifiedCeratitis capitataGenes, LethalInfertility, MalePest Control, BiologicalAnimalsFemaleMalePupa

Identifiers

PMID30550598
PMCPMC6294381
OpenAlexW2903794247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.