Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30550579›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Impact of a patient-flow physician coordinator on waiting times and length of stay in an emergency department: A before-after cohort study.

Marta Morais Oliveira, Christophe Marti, Majd Ramlawi, François P Sarasin, Olivier Grosgurin, Pierre-Alexandre Poletti, Frédéric Rouyer, Olivier T Rutschmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Reduced left-without-being-seen rates and impact on disparities after guest services ambassadors implementation.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2025
    Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marta Morais OliveiraGeneva School of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland.
Christophe MartiDivision General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Rehabilitation and Geriatrics, Geneva University Hospitals and School of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland.
Majd RamlawiDivision of Emergency Medicine, Department of Community, Primary Care and Emergency Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals and School of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland.
François P SarasinDivision of Emergency Medicine, Department of Community, Primary Care and Emergency Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals and School of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland.
Olivier GrosgurinDivision of Emergency Medicine, Department of Community, Primary Care and Emergency Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals and School of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland.
Pierre-Alexandre PolettiDivision of Emergency Medicine, Department of Community, Primary Care and Emergency Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals and School of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland.
Frédéric RouyerDivision of Emergency Medicine, Department of Community, Primary Care and Emergency Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals and School of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland.
Olivier T RutschmannDivision of Emergency Medicine, Department of Community, Primary Care and Emergency Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals and School of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6178-3254

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveOvercrowding is common in most emergency departments (ED). Despite the use of validated triage systems, some patients are at risk of delayed medical evaluation. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of a patient-flow physician coordinator (PFPC) on the proportion of patients offered medical evaluation within time limits imposed by the Swiss Emergency Triage Scale (SETS) and on patient flow within the emergency department of a teaching urban hospital.

methodsIn this before-after retrospective cohort study, we compared the proportions of patients who received their first medical contact within SETS-imposed time limits, mean waiting times before first medical consultation, mean length of stay, and number of patients who left without being seen by a physician, between two periods before and after introducing a PFPC. The PFPC was a senior physician charged with quickly assessing in the waiting area patients who could not immediately be seen and managing patient flow within the department.

resultsBefore introducing the PFPC position, 33,605 patients were admitted, versus 36,288 after. Introducing a PFPC enabled the department to increase the proportion of patients seen within the SETS-imposed time limits from 60.1% to 69.0% (p <0.0001). Waiting times until first medical consultation were reduced on average by 27.7 minutes (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 25.9-29.5, p < .0001). No significant differences were observed as to length of stay or number of patients who left without being seen between the two study periods.

conclusionsIntroducing a physician dedicated to managing patient flow enabled waiting times until first medical consultation to be reduced, yet had no significant benefit for patient flow within the ED, nor did it reduce the number of patients who left without being seen.

Indexed as

Physician-Patient RelationsWaiting ListsCohort StudiesCrowdingEfficiency, OrganizationalEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID30550579
PMCPMC6294432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.