Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30550574›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2018

Supportive interventions to improve retention on ART in people with HIV in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review.

Amy W Penn, Hana Azman, Hacsi Horvath, Kelly D Taylor, Matthew D Hickey, Jay Rajan, Eyerusalem K Negussie, Margaret Doherty, George W Rutherford

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudySystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04564209 (Information Visualizations to Facilitate Clinician-patient Communication in HIV Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04564209 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Information Visualizations to Facilitate Clinician-patient Communication in HIV Care (Info Viz: HIV)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Colorado, DenverRan2021 to 2023Enrolled164ConditionsHIV, Communication ResearchArmsInfo Viz for Health
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. AIDS patient care and STDs · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Amy W PennSchool of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2791-1771
Hana AzmanInstitute for Global Health Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Hacsi HorvathInstitute for Global Health Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Kelly D TaylorInstitute for Global Health Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Matthew D HickeySchool of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Jay RajanSchool of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Eyerusalem K NegussieDepartment of HIV/AIDS, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Margaret DohertyDepartment of HIV/AIDS, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
George W RutherfordInstitute for Global Health Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo determine whether supportive interventions can increase retention in care for patients on antiretroviral therapy (ART) in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC).

designSystematic review and meta-analysis.

methodsWe used Cochrane Collaboration methods. We included randomised controlled trials (RCT) and observational studies with comparators conducted in LMIC. Our principal outcomes were retention, mortality and the combined outcome of lost-to-follow-up (LTFU) or death.

resultsWe identified seven studies (published in nine articles); six of the studies were from Sub-Saharan Africa. We found four types of interventions: 1) directly observed therapy plus extra support ("DOT-plus"), 2) community-based adherence support, 3) adherence clubs and 4) extra care for patients with low CD4 count. One RCT of a community-based intervention showed significantly improved retention at 12 months (RR 1.14, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.27), and three observational studies found significantly improved retention for paediatric patients followed for 12 to 36 months (RR 1.07, 95 CI 1.03 to 1.11), and for adult patients at 12 (RR 1.38, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.70) and 60 months (RR 1.07, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.08). One observational study of adherence clubs showed significantly reduced LTFU or mortality (RR 0.20, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.33). A cluster RCT of an extra-care intervention for high-risk patients also showed a significant increase in retention (RR 1.06, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.10), and an observational study of extra nursing care found a significant decrease in LTFU or mortality (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.87).

conclusionsSupportive interventions are associated with increased ART programme retention, but evidence quality is generally low to moderate. The data from this review suggest that programmes addressing psychosocial needs can significantly help retain patients in care.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareDeveloping CountriesHIV-1Anti-Retroviral AgentsFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMaleObservational Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRisk FactorsAnti-Retroviral Agents

Identifiers

PMID30550574
PMCPMC6294385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.