Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30550372›Full record

ArticleJournal of oncology practice2019

Communicating Risks of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer: Getting Beyond the Laundry List.

Eden R Brauer, Elisa F Long, Joy Melnikow, Peter M Ravdin, Patricia A Ganz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of oncology practice, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Psychosocial burden in cancer survivors.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Patient perceptions of altering chemotherapy treatment due to peripheral neuropathy.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Reporting of paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy symptoms to clinicians among women with breast cancer: a qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eden R Brauer1 UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA.
Elisa F Long2 UCLA Anderson School of Management, Los Angeles, CA.
Joy Melnikow3 UC Davis Center for Healthcare Policy and Research, Davis, CA.
Peter M Ravdin4 University of Texas Health Sciences Center, San Antonio, TX.
Patricia A Ganz5 UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA.

Funding

Biobehavioral predictors of fatigue in newly-diagnosed breast cancer patientsR01CA160427 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI BOWER, JULIENNE E · 2012 to 2016
$3.2M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA160427
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAccording to the Institute of Medicine, high-quality cancer care should include effective communication between clinicians and patients about the risks and benefits, expected response, and impact on quality of life of a recommended therapy. In the delivery of oncology care, the barriers to and facilitators of communication about potential long-term and late effects, post-treatment expectations, and transition to survivorship care have not been fully defined. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe collected qualitative data through semistructured interviews with medical oncologists and focus groups with breast cancer survivors and applied the Theoretical Domains Framework to systematically analyze and identify the factors that may influence oncologists' communication with patients with breast cancer about the long-term and late effects of adjuvant therapy.

resultsEight key informant interviews with medical oncologists and two focus groups with breast cancer survivors provided data. Both oncologists and patients perceived information on long-term effects as valuable in terms of improved clinical communication but had concerns about the feasibility of inclusion before treatment. They described the current approaches to communication of therapy risks as a brief laundry list that emphasized acute adverse effects and minimized more long-term issues. We describe the barriers to communication about potential long-term effects from the perspectives of both groups.

conclusionThis study provides insight into oncologists' communication with patients with breast cancer regarding the potential long-term and late effects of adjuvant chemotherapy and about setting realistic expectations for life after treatment. Opportunities to improve oncologists' communication about the potential toxicities of therapy, particularly regarding long-term and late effects, should be examined further.

Indexed as

CommunicationAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBreast NeoplasmsCancer SurvivorsChemotherapy, AdjuvantClinical Decision-MakingFemaleHumansMedical OncologyOncologistsQuality of Health CareRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID30550372
PMCPMC6374637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.