ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2019
Toward Building Protein Force Fields by Residue-Based Systematic Molecular Fragmentation and Neural Network.
Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Toward a general neural network force field for protein simulations: Refining the intramolecular interaction in protein.The Journal of chemical physics · 2023Article
- Nonadiabatic Derivative Couplings Calculated Using Information of Potential Energy Surfaces without Wavefunctions: Ab Initio and Machine Learning Implementations.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Machine Learning for Electronically Excited States of Molecules.Chemical reviews · 2021Article
- Coarse graining molecular dynamics with graph neural networks.The Journal of chemical physics · 2020Article
- Combining SchNet and SHARC: The SchNarc Machine Learning Approach for Excited-State Dynamics.The journal of physical chemistry letters · 2020Article
- Machine Learning of Coarse-Grained Molecular Dynamics Force Fields.ACS central science · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate force fields are crucial for molecular dynamics investigation of complex biological systems. Building accurate protein force fields from quantum mechanical (QM) calculations is challenging due to the complexity of proteins and high computational costs of QM methods. In order to overcome these two difficulties, here we developed the residue-based systematic molecular fragmentation method to partition general proteins into only 20 types of amino acid dipeptides and one type of peptide bond at level 1. The total energy of proteins is the combination of the energies of these fragments. Each type of the fragments is then parametrized using neural network (NN) representation of the QM reference. Adopting NN representation can circumvent the limitation of the analytic form of classical molecular mechanics (MM) force fields. Using MM force fields as the baseline, our method adds NN representation of QM corrections at the length scale of amino acid dipeptides. We tested our force fields for both homogeneous and heterogeneous polypeptides. Energy and forces predicted by our force fields compare favorably with full QM calculations from tripeptides to decapeptides. Our development provides an efficient and accurate method of building protein force fields fully from ab initio QM calculations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.