Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30550256›Full record

ReviewACS chemical neuroscience2019

Hacking the Brain: Dimensions of Cognitive Enhancement.

Martin Dresler, Anders Sandberg, Christoph Bublitz, Kathrin Ohla, Carlos Trenado, Aleksandra Mroczko-Wąsowicz, Simone Kühn, Dimitris Repantis

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS chemical neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 155 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Acute Supplementation of Soluble Mango Leaf Extract (ZynamitePharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Cognitive Enhancement through Differential Rope Skipping after Math Lesson.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Martin DreslerDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour , Radboud University Medical Centre , Nijmegen 6525 EN , The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7441-3818
Anders SandbergFuture of Humanity Institute , Oxford University , Oxford OX1 1PT , United Kingdom.
Christoph BublitzFaculty of Law , University of Hamburg , Hamburg 20148 , Germany.
Kathrin OhlaInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Cognitive Neuroscience (INM3) , Forschungszentrum Jülich , Jülich 52428 , Germany.
Carlos TrenadoInstitute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology , Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf , Düsseldorf 40225 , Germany.
Aleksandra Mroczko-WąsowiczInstitute of Philosophy of Mind and Cognition , National Yang-Ming University , Taipei 112 , Taiwan.
Simone KühnMax Planck Institute for Human Development , Berlin 14195 , Germany.
Dimitris RepantisDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin 12203 , Germany.
Universität Hamburg · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEForschungszentrum Jülich · DENational Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TWRadboud University Nijmegen · NLTU Dortmund University · DEUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In an increasingly complex information society, demands for cognitive functioning are growing steadily. In recent years, numerous strategies to augment brain function have been proposed. Evidence for their efficacy (or lack thereof) and side effects has prompted discussions about ethical, societal, and medical implications. In the public debate, cognitive enhancement is often seen as a monolithic phenomenon. On a closer look, however, cognitive enhancement turns out to be a multifaceted concept: There is not one cognitive enhancer that augments brain function per se, but a great variety of interventions that can be clustered into biochemical, physical, and behavioral enhancement strategies. These cognitive enhancers differ in their mode of action, the cognitive domain they target, the time scale they work on, their availability and side effects, and how they differentially affect different groups of subjects. Here we disentangle the dimensions of cognitive enhancement, review prominent examples of cognitive enhancers that differ across these dimensions, and thereby provide a framework for both theoretical discussions and empirical research.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainCognitionCognitive Behavioral TherapyHumansNootropic AgentsTranscranial Magnetic StimulationNootropic Agentsattentionbrain hackingcognitioncreativitymemoryNeuroenhancementneuroethicsworking memory

Identifiers

PMID30550256
PMCPMC6429408
OpenAlexW2904292305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.