ArticleAmerican journal of community psychology2019
No Easy Answers: Avoiding Potential Pitfalls of De-implementation.
Article in American journal of community psychology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Blending De-implementation and Implementation to Promote Adoption of Universal PrEP Guidelines: Determinants, Strategies, and Outcomes.Critical public health · 2025Article
- The de-implementation and persistence of low-value HIV prevention interventions in the United States: a cross-sectional study.Implementation science communications · 2020Article
- Community engagement in dissemination and implementation models: A narrative review.Implementation research and practiceReview
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In 2012, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) began to de-emphasize and de-implement multiple evidence-based HIV prevention practices that had been around for 20 years, thus changing the scope of implementation across the globe. The authors provide evidence how existing interventions (e.g., CDC HIV interventions) may influence implementation of interventions that came after the program was discontinued. De-implementation is an ecological event that influences, and is influenced by, many parts of a system, for instance, implementation of one type of intervention may influence the implementation of other interventions (biomedical and/or behavioral) after a long-running program is discontinued. Researchers and policy makers ought to consider how de-implementation of behavioral interventions is influenced by biomedical interventions mass-produced by companies with lobbying power. The scientific study of de-implementation will be inadequate without consideration of the political climate that surrounds de-implementation of certain types of interventions and the promotion of more-profitable ones.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.