Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30549207›Full record

ReviewThe FEBS journal2019

Beyond the message: advantages of snapshot proteomics with single-cell mass cytometry in solid tumors.

Akshitkumar M Mistry, Allison R Greenplate, Rebecca A Ihrie, Jonathan M Irish

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The FEBS journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Single cell metabolism: current and future trends.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Cancer: a mirrored room between tumor bulk and tumor microenvironment.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Akshitkumar M MistryDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7918-5153
Allison R GreenplateVanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2614-3072
Rebecca A IhrieDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0439-0141
Jonathan M IrishDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9428-8866
Vanderbilt University · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

Single-Cell Biology and Data Analysis Shared Resource (SCB-DA SR)U54CA217450 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI WEAVER, ALISSA M · 2018 to 2022
$8.5M
Single Cell Methods for Bioeffector Discovery and AnalysisR01CA226833 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI BRIAN O BACHMANN, Jonathan Michael Irish · 2019 to 2026
$6.1M
Quantifying Differences in mTOR Activity and Tumor Development Between Neural Stem Cell MicrodomainsR01NS096238 · NINDS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI IHRIE, REBECCA A · 2016 to 2020
$1.7M
Targeting the B Cell Receptor Signaling Network in LymphomaR00CA143231 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI IRISH, JONATHAN MICHAEL · 2012 to 2014
$715k
Dissecting the Molecular Mechanisms of Stem Cell Niche Invasion and Radiotherapy Resistance in GlioblastomaF32CA224962 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI MISTRY, AKSHITKUMAR · 2018 to 2019
$87k
NCI NIH HHS F32 CA224962NCI NIH HHS R00 CA143231NCI NIH HHS R01 CA226833NCI NIH HHS U54 CA217450NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS096238
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-cell technologies that can quantify features of individual cells within a tumor are critical for treatment strategies aiming to target cancer cells while sparing or activating beneficial cells. Given that key players in protein networks are often the primary targets of precision oncology strategies, it is imperative to transcend the nucleic acid message and read cellular actions in human solid tumors. Here, we review the advantages of multiplex, single-cell mass cytometry in tissue and solid tumor investigations. Mass cytometry can quantitatively probe nearly any cellular feature or target. In discussing the ability of mass cytometry to reveal and characterize a broad spectrum of cell types, identify rare cells, and study functional behavior through protein signaling networks in millions of individual cells from a tumor, this review surveys publications of scientific advances in solid tumor biology made with the aid of mass cytometry. Advances discussed include functional identification of rare tumor and tumor-infiltrating immune cells and dissection of cellular mechanisms of immunotherapy in solid tumors and the periphery. The review concludes by highlighting ways to incorporate single-cell mass cytometry in solid tumor precision oncology efforts and rapidly developing cytometry techniques for quantifying cell location and sequenced nucleic acids.

Indexed as

HumansImage CytometryMass SpectrometryNeoplasmsPrecision MedicineProteinsProteomicsSensitivity and SpecificitySignal TransductionSingle-Cell AnalysisTumor MicroenvironmentProteinsimmune cellimmunotherapymass cytometryproteomicssignalingsingle cell

Identifiers

PMID30549207
PMCPMC6478512
OpenAlexW2905539986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.