Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30549154›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2019

An empirical evaluation of multivariate lesion behaviour mapping using support vector regression.

Christoph Sperber, Daniel Wiesen, Hans-Otto Karnath

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Critical-Network Lesion-Symptom Mapping.Human brain mapping · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Lesion-symptom mapping reveals differential relationships between language and precise versus approximate numeracy.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Using unsupervised dimensionality reduction to identify lesion patterns predictive of post-stroke aphasia severity.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Prediction of stroke severity: systematic evaluation of lesion representations.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Lesion mapping in neuropsychological research: A practical and conceptual guide.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christoph SperberCentre of Neurology, Division of Neuropsychology, Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6493-6543
Daniel WiesenCentre of Neurology, Division of Neuropsychology, Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Hans-Otto KarnathCentre of Neurology, Division of Neuropsychology, Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft KA 1258/23-1Friedrich Naumann FoundationLuxembourg National Research Fund FNR/11601161
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multivariate lesion behaviour mapping based on machine learning algorithms has recently been suggested to complement the methods of anatomo-behavioural approaches in cognitive neuroscience. Several studies applied and validated support vector regression-based lesion symptom mapping (SVR-LSM) to map anatomo-behavioural relations. However, this promising method, as well as the multivariate approach per se, still bears many open questions. By using large lesion samples in three simulation experiments, the present study empirically tested the validity of several methodological aspects. We found that (i) correction for multiple comparisons is required in the current implementation of SVR-LSM, (ii) that sample sizes of at least 100-120 subjects are required to optimally model voxel-wise lesion location in SVR-LSM, and (iii) that SVR-LSM is susceptible to misplacement of statistical topographies along the brain's vasculature to a similar extent as mass-univariate analyses.

Indexed as

BehaviorSupport Vector MachineAlgorithmsBiasBrain DiseasesBrain MappingCerebrovascular CirculationHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingModels, NeurologicalStrokemachine learningsupport vector regressionSVR-LSMVLSMvoxel-based lesion behaviour mappingvoxel-based lesion symptom mapping

Identifiers

PMID30549154
PMCPMC6865618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.