Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30548810›Full record

ArticleAnatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007)2019

Prediction Algorithm of the Cat Spinal Segments Lengths and Positions in Relation to the Vertebrae.

Polina Y Shkorbatova, Vsevolod A Lyakhovetskii, Natalia S Merkulyeva, Alexandr A Veshchitskii, Elena Y Bazhenova, Jean Laurens, Natalia V Pavlova, Pavel E Musienko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Case Report: Presumptive spinal embryonal tumor in a cat.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
  3. Forward Stepping Evoked by Transvertebral Stimulation in the Decerebrate Cat.Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Neurochemical atlas of the cat spinal cord.Frontiers in neuroanatomy · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Polina Y ShkorbatovaPavlov Institute of Physiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
Vsevolod A LyakhovetskiiPavlov Institute of Physiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
Natalia S MerkulyevaPavlov Institute of Physiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
Alexandr A VeshchitskiiPavlov Institute of Physiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
Elena Y BazhenovaPavlov Institute of Physiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
Jean LaurensDepartment of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Natalia V PavlovaPavlov Institute of Physiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
Pavel E MusienkoPavlov Institute of Physiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-7324-9021

Funding

Neural mechanisms of locomotion evoked by epidural stimulation of the spinal cordR01NS100928 · NINDS · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI PRILUTSKY, BORIS I · 2017 to 2021
$2.7M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS100928President of Russian Federation MD-1018.2017.7Russian Foundation for Basic Research 16-04-01791Russian Foundation for Basic Research 17-04-01822Russian Foundation for Basic Research 17-29-01034-ofi-m
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Detailed knowledge of the topographic organization and precise access to the spinal cord segments is crucial for the neurosurgical manipulations as well as in vivo neurophysiological investigations of the spinal networks involved in sensorimotor and visceral functions. Because of high individual variability, accurate identification of particular portion of the lumbosacral enlargement is normally possible only during postmortem dissection. Yet, it is often necessary to determine the precise location of spinal segments prior to in vivo investigation, targeting spinal cord manipulations, neurointerface implantations, and neuronal activity recordings. To solve this problem, we have developed an algorithm to predict spinal segments locations based on their relation to vertebral reference points. The lengths and relative positions of the spinal cord segments (T13-S3) and the vertebrae (VT13-VL7) were measured in 17 adult cats. On the basis of these measurements, we elaborated the estimation procedure: the cubic regression of the ratio of the segment's length to the lengths of the VL2 vertebra was used for the determination of segment's length; and the quadratic regression of the ratio of their positions in relation to the VL2 rostral part was used to determine the position of the segments. The coefficients of these regressions were calculated at the training sample (nine cats) and were then confirmed at the testing sample (eight cats). Although the quality of the prediction is decreased in the caudal direction, we found high correlations between the regressions and real data. The proposed algorithm can be further translated to other species including human. Anat Rec, 302:1628-1637, 2019. © 2018 American Association for Anatomy.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnimalsCatsFemaleMaleSpinal CordSpinecatdorsal rootsprediction algorithmsegmentsspinal cordvertebrae

Identifiers

PMID30548810
PMCPMC6561844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.