Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30548689›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary internal medicine2019

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of intravenous esomeprazole at 2 different dosages in dogs.

Do-Hyun Seo, Jong-Bok Lee, Ji-Hye Hwang, Jong-Woo Jeong, Gun-Ho Song, Tae-Sung Koo, Kyoung-Won Seo

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Veterinary
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary internal medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pharmacokinetics of esomeprazole in goats (Frontiers in veterinary science · 2022
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Do-Hyun SeoLaboratory of Veterinary Internal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Jong-Bok LeeLaboratory of Veterinary Internal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon-si, Republic of Korea.
Ji-Hye HwangLaboratory of Veterinary Internal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Jong-Woo JeongGraduate School of New Drug Discovery and Development, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Gun-Ho SongLaboratory of Veterinary Internal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Tae-Sung KooGraduate School of New Drug Discovery and Development, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Kyoung-Won SeoLaboratory of Veterinary Internal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1561-3278
Chungnam National University · KRKangwon National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough the demand for esomeprazole is increasing in veterinary medicine, the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics of esomeprazole have been described in only a few studies.

objectiveTo determine the PK of 0.5 and 1 mg/kg esomeprazole administered IV q12h and to investigate its effects on intragastric pH in healthy dogs. ANIMALS: Six adult Beagles.

methodsOpen-label, randomized, and crossover design. The dogs received 0.5 or 1 mg/kg esomeprazole IV q12h for 48 hours. Plasma concentrations of esomeprazole were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Intragastric pH was determined using the Bravo pH monitoring system and recorded as mean percentage time (MPT) for which pH was ≥3 and ≥4 for 24 hours in each group.

resultsThe peak plasma concentration and area under the curve from the time of dosing to the last measurable concentration in the 1 mg/kg group were higher than those in the 0.5 mg/kg group. However, when the dosage normalized, intergroup differences were not significant. The MPTs for which intragastric pH was ≥3 and ≥4 for 48 hours were 88% ± 7% and 81% ± 9% for the 0.5 mg/kg group and 90% ± 9% and 85% ± 11% for the 1 mg/kg group, respectively, with no significant intergroup differences. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: The pharmacokinetic parameters and acid suppressant effect for 0.5 and 1 mg/kg esomeprazole were not significantly different. Furthermore, the efficacy of esomeprazole 0.5 mg/kg IV q12h was sufficient to increase intragastric pH in Beagles.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Ulcer AgentsArea Under CurveChromatography, High Pressure LiquidCross-Over StudiesDogsDose-Response Relationship, DrugEsomeprazoleGastric AcidGastric Acidity DeterminationHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationInjections, IntravenousRandom AllocationAnti-Ulcer AgentsEsomeprazoleBravo pH monitoring systemcanineIVq12hS-omeprazole

Identifiers

PMID30548689
PMCPMC6430889
OpenAlexW2903759290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.