Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30548374›Full record

ArticleAddiction (Abingdon, England)2019

Discussions between health professionals and smokers about nicotine vaping products: results from the 2016 ITC Four Country Smoking and Vaping Survey.

Shannon Gravely, James F Thrasher, K Michael Cummings, Janine Ouimet, Ann McNeill, Gang Meng, Eric N Lindblom, Ruth Loewen, Richard J O'Connor, Mary E Thompson and 9 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Improved Documentation of Electronic Cigarette Use in an Electronic Health Record.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 13 institutions in 6 countries.

Shannon GravelyDepartment of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
James F ThrasherDepartment of Health Promotion, Education and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
K Michael CummingsDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Janine OuimetDepartment of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Ann McNeillAddictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Gang MengDepartment of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Eric N LindblomO'Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law, Georgetown University Law Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Ruth LoewenDepartment of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Richard J O'ConnorDepartment of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Mary E ThompsonDepartment of Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Sara C HitchmanAddictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
David HammondSchool of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Bryan W HeckmanDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Ron BorlandCancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Hua-Hie YongCancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Tara Elton-MarshallInstitute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, London, ON, Canada.
Maansi Bansal-TraversDepartment of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Coral GartnerSchool of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Geoffrey T FongDepartment of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
University of Waterloo · CARoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · USCancer Council Victoria · AUDepartment of Health Services · USGeorgetown University · USKing's College London · GBMedical University of South Carolina · USMUSC Hollings Cancer Center · USOntario Institute for Cancer Research · CAUK Centre for Tobacco & Alcohol Studies · GBUniversity of Melbourne · AUUniversity of Queensland · AUUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

Vaporized Nicotine Product Initiation Among Youth in the US, Canada, and England: Methods to Predict Uptake and Policy EfficacyP01CA200512 · NCI · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI CUMMINGS, KENNETH MICHAEL · 2016 to 2025
$25.3M
Personalized Smoking Relapse Prevention Delivered in Real-Time via Just-in-time Adaptive InterventionsK23DA041616 · NIDA · MEHARRY MEDICAL COLLEGE · PI HECKMAN, BRYAN WAYNE · 2017 to 2021
$929k
CIHR FDN‐148477NCI NIH HHS P01 CA200512NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA041616
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsDebate exists about whether health professionals (HPs) should advise smokers to use nicotine vaping products (NVPs) to quit smoking. The objectives were to examine in four countries: (1) the prevalence of HP discussions and recommendations to use an NVP; (2) who initiated NVP discussions; (3) the type of HP advice received about NVPs; and (4) smoker's characteristics related to receiving advice about NVPs.

designCross-sectional study using multivariable logistic regression analyses on weighted data from the 2016 ITC Four Country Smoking and Vaping Survey (ITC 4CV1).

settingFour countries with varying regulations governing the sale and marketing of NVPs: 'most restrictive' (Australia), 'restrictive' (Canada) or 'less restrictive' (England and United States).

participantsA total of 6615 adult smokers who reported having visited an HP in the last year (drawn from the total sample of 12 294 4CV1 respondents, of whom 9398 reported smoking cigarettes daily or weekly). Respondents were from the United States (n = 1518), England (n = 2116), Australia (n = 1046), and Canada (n = 1935). MEASUREMENTS: Participants' survey responses indicated if they were current daily or weekly smokers and had visited an HP in the past year. Among those participants, further questions asked participants to report (1) whether NVPs were discussed, (2) who raised the topic, (3) advice received on use of NVPs and (4) advice received on quitting smoking.

findingsAmong the 6615 smokers who visited an HP in the last year, 6.8% reported discussing NVPs with an HP and 2.1% of smokers were encouraged to use an NVP (36.1% of those who had a discussion). Compared with Australia (4.3%), discussing NVPs with an HP was more likely in the United States [8.8%, odds ratio (OR) = 2.15, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.41-3.29] and Canada (7.8%, OR = 1.87, 95% CI = 1.26-2.78). Smokers in Australia were less likely to discuss NVPs than smokers in England (6.2%), although this was not statistically significant (OR = 1.47, 95% CI = 0.98-2.20). Overall, the prevalence of HPs recommending NVPs was three times more likely in the United States than in Australia (OR = 3.07, 95% CI = 1.45-6.47), and twice as likely in Canada (OR = 2.28, 95% CI = 1.06-4.87) than in Australia. Australia and England did not differ (OR = 1.76, 95% CI = 0.83-3.74). Just over half (54%) of respondents brought up NVPs themselves; there were no significant differences among countries.

conclusionsDiscussions in Australia, Canada, England, and the United States between smokers and health professionals about nicotine vaping products appear to be infrequent, regardless of the regulatory environment. A low percentage of health professionals recommended vaping products. This was particularly evident in Australia, which has the most restrictive regulatory environment of the four countries studied.

Indexed as

Health EducationProfessional-Patient RelationsAdultAgedAttitude to HealthCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSmokingSmoking CessationVapingE-cigaretteshealth professionalnicotine vaping productspolicyregulationsmokers

Identifiers

PMID30548374
PMCPMC6559875
OpenAlexW2905067783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.