SynthesisHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2019
Patient and public involvement in medical performance processes: A systematic review.
Synthesis in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Impact of digital health interventions on patient satisfaction in outpatient gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review.BMJ open gastroenterology · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Patient and Public Willingness to Share Personal Health Data for Third-Party or Secondary Uses: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Pooled it
- Meaningful patient and public involvement in digital health innovation, implementation and evaluation: A systematic review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022Pooled it
- Patient and public involvement in medical performance processes: A systematic review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2019Pooled it
- A case study of patient and public involvement in sepsis genomics research.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Article
- Healthcare Professionals' Responses to Complaints: A Qualitative Interview Study With Patients, Carers and Healthcare Professionals Using the Theoretical Domains Framework and COM-B Model.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024Article
- Public Involvement and Engagement in Big Data Research: Scoping Review.Journal of participatory medicine · 2024Article
- Evaluation of Public Involvement in Doctoral Research Using a Four-Dimensional Theoretical Framework.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024Article
- 'To me, it's ones and zeros, but in reality that one is death': A qualitative study exploring researchers' experience of involving and engaging seldom-heard communities in big data research.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023Article
- Increasing consumer engagement: tools to engage service users in quality improvement or implementation efforts.Frontiers in health services · 2023Article
- 'Good' and 'bad' doctors - a qualitative study of the Austrian public on the elements of professional medical identity.Medical education online · 2022Article
- The patient as a prosumer of healthcare: insights from a bibliometric-interpretive review.Journal of health organization and management · 2022Article
- Women survivors of intimate partner violence talk about using e-health during pregnancy: a focus group study.BMC women's health · 2022Article
- Self-management support in flemish primary care practice: the development of a preliminary conceptual model using a qualitative approach.BMC primary care · 2022Article
- Recurrence, postponing pregnancy, and termination rates after hyperemesis gravidarum: Follow up of the MOTHER study.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2021Article
- Article
- The sociocultural and behavioural characteristics that patients want in psychiatrists: cross-sectional survey of patients' views.BJPsych bulletin · 2021Article
- Identifying and encouraging high-quality healthcare: an analysis of the content and aims of patient letters of compliment.BMJ quality & safety · 2021Article
- Doctors' maintenance of professional competence: a qualitative study informed by the theory of planned behaviour.BMC health services research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPatient and public involvement (PPI) continues to develop as a central policy agenda in health care. The patient voice is seen as relevant, informative and can drive service improvement. However, critical exploration of PPI's role within monitoring and informing medical performance processes remains limited.
objectiveTo explore and evaluate the contribution of PPI in medical performance processes to understand its extent, purpose and process. SEARCH STRATEGY: The electronic databases PubMed, PsycINFO and Google Scholar were systematically searched for studies published between 2004 and 2018. INCLUSION CRITERIA: Studies involving doctors and patients and all forms of patient input (eg, patient feedback) associated with medical performance were included. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Using an inductive approach to analysis and synthesis, a coding framework was developed which was structured around three key themes: issues that shape PPI in medical performance processes; mechanisms for PPI; and the potential impacts of PPI on medical performance processes. MAIN
resultsFrom 4772 studies, 48 articles (from 10 countries) met the inclusion criteria. Findings suggest that the extent of PPI in medical performance processes globally is highly variable and is primarily achieved through providing patient feedback or complaints. The emerging evidence suggests that PPI can encourage improvements in the quality of patient care, enable professional development and promote professionalism. DISCUSSION AND
conclusionsDeveloping more innovative methods of PPI beyond patient feedback and complaints may help revolutionize the practice of PPI into a collaborative partnership, facilitating the development of proactive relationships between the medical profession, patients and the public.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.