Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30548215›Full record

ArticleActa ophthalmologica2019

Conjunctival melanoma and electrochemotherapy: preliminary results using 2D and 3D cell culture models in vitro.

Miltiadis Fiorentzis, Periklis Katopodis, Helen Kalirai, Berthold Seitz, Arne Viestenz, Sarah E Coupland

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta ophthalmologica, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Evaluation of the Anti-Pharmaceutics · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Miltiadis FiorentzisDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Halle (Saale), Martin-Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7868-5167
Periklis KatopodisLiverpool Ocular Oncology Research Group, Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Helen KaliraiLiverpool Ocular Oncology Research Group, Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Berthold SeitzDepartment of Ophthalmology, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Arne ViestenzDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Halle (Saale), Martin-Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Sarah E CouplandLiverpool Ocular Oncology Research Group, Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
University of Liverpool · GBMartin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg · DESaarland University · DE

Funding

Dr. Rolf M. Schwiete-StiftungGertrud Kusen-Stiftung
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate the cytotoxic effect of bleomycin, mitomycin C (MMC) and Fluorouracil (5-FU) in combination with electroporation (EP) on human conjunctival melanoma (CM) and normal conjunctival cell lines using 2D and 3D cell culture systems in vitro.

methodsTwo CM (CRMM1, CRMM2) and one normal conjunctival epithelial cell line (HCjE-Gi) were treated with various EP conditions and increasing concentrations of 5-FU, MMC and bleomycin. Cell survival was assessed by MTT viability assay. All cell lines were seeded to create spheroids and were treated with bleomycin on day 3 and day 8 combined with EP. Spheroids were collected, fixed in buffered formalin and subsequently paraffin embedded for histological assessment of the effects of the treatment on cell viability.

resultsCM cell lines were resistant to electroporation alone and showed a reduction in cell number only when treated with 1000 Volts/cm and 8 pulses. HCjE-Gi cells showed higher sensitivity to electric pulses over 750 Volts/cm. MMC and 5-FU demonstrated a higher cytotoxicity for the HCjE-Gi cell line. The CM cell lines were resistant to MMC and 5-FU. Bleomycin (1 μg/ml) alone had no significant effect on the HCjE-Gi even when combined with EP conditions ≥750 Volts/cm. In contrast, it significantly (p -, paired t-test) reduced cell viability in the CM cell lines. Spheroids treated with bleomycin and EP showed a reduction in tumour mass and proliferation rates after treatment.

conclusionOur in vitro study using 2D and 3D models indicates that the application of EP may effectively enhance chemotherapy with bleomycin in CM. This may offer new viable perspectives for CM treatment.

Indexed as

Imaging, Three-DimensionalCell SurvivalConjunctivaConjunctival NeoplasmsElectrochemotherapyFlow CytometryHumansMelanomaTumor Cells, Culturedbleomycinconjunctival melanomaelectrochemotherapyelectroporation

Identifiers

PMID30548215
PMCPMC6590119
OpenAlexW2903921453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.