ReviewOncology nursing forum2019
Treatment Decision-Making Involvement in Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer.
Review in Oncology nursing forum, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Decision aids for cancer survivors' engagement with survivorship care services after primary treatment: a systematic review.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2024Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Adolescents and young adults with cancer conversations following participation in an advance care planning video pilot.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024Trial
- Effect of receiving a customizable brochure on breast cancer patients' knowledge about their diagnosis and treatment: A randomized clinical trial.Cancer medicine · 2023Trial
- In their words: Experience of decision-making in adolescents with cancer - a qualitative meta-synthesis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Article
- Child and Adolescent Cancer Communication Preferences for Treatment Decision Making: A Meta-Synthesis.Pediatric blood & cancer · 2025Review
- Decision-making when a child with haematological malignancy relapses following haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A meta-ethnographic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Review
- Characteristics of child development in the context of serious illness: a scoping review.BMC palliative care · 2025Article
- Pharmacogenomics in pediatric oncology: Australian adolescent or young adult and caregiver perspectives.Genetics in medicine open · 2025Article
- Mixed-method examination of factors associated with adolescent decision-making and involvement in care in the context of advanced cancer.Palliative & supportive care · 2024Article
- How do we best engage young people in decision-making about their health? A scoping review of deliberative priority setting methods.International journal for equity in health · 2023Article
- Cancer-Related Decision-Making Among Adolescents, Young Adults, Caregivers, and Oncology Providers.Qualitative health research · 2021Article
- Reporting the whole story: Analysis of the 'out-of-scope' questions from the James Lind Alliance Teenage and Young Adult Cancer Priority Setting Partnership Survey.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021Article
- Evaluation of a Decision Support Intervention for Adolescents and Young Adults Newly Diagnosed with Cancer: A Pilot Randomized Trial.MDM policy & practiceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
problem identificationInvolvement in treatment decision making (TDM) is considered a key element of patient- and family-centered care and positively affects outcomes. However, for adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer, little is known about the current state of knowledge about their perspective on and involvement in TDM or the factors influencing AYAs' TDM involvement. LITERATURE SEARCH: Integrative review focused on AYAs aged 15-21 years, their involvement in TDM, and factors influencing their involvement using the MEDLINE®, PsycINFO®, CINAHL®, and Web of Science databases. DATA EVALUATION: 4,047 articles were identified; 21 met inclusion criteria. SYNTHESIS: Five factors were identified. IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH: Research is needed to understand AYAs' preferences for TDM, the type and degree of their involvement, and the interactions between factors that contribute to or impede TDM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.