Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30547901›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2018

Time Intervals Between Prior Cervical Conization and Posterior Hysterectomy Influence Postoperative Infection in Patients with Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia or Cancer.

Xinming Yin, Li Zhu, Weiwei Tan, Xiaolan Zhu, Songping Liu, Wenlin Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Two Multidrug-ResistantPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xinming YinDepartment of Gynecology, Maternal and Child Care Service Center, Zhenjiang 4th Hospital, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu, China (mainland).
Li ZhuDepartment of Gynecology, Maternal and Child Care Service Center, Zhenjiang 4th Hospital, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu, China (mainland).
Weiwei TanDepartment of Gynecology, Maternal and Child Care Service Center, Zhenjiang 4th Hospital, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu, China (mainland).
Xiaolan ZhuDepartment of Gynecology, Maternal and Child Care Service Center, Zhenjiang 4th Hospital, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu, China (mainland).
Songping LiuDepartment of Gynecology, Maternal and Child Care Service Center, Zhenjiang 4th Hospital, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu, China (mainland).
Wenlin XuDepartment of Gynecology, Maternal and Child Care Service Center, Zhenjiang 4th Hospital, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu, China (mainland).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND This study was conducted to observe the influence of different time intervals between prior cervical conization and posterior hysterectomy on postoperative infection in female patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS Medical records of 170 patients who underwent hysterectomy following cervical conization between November 2010 and September 2016 at the Zhenjiang 4th Hospital were reviewed. According to the interval between hysterectomy and cervical conization, patients were classified into 1-2-week, 4-5-week, and 6-week groups. The outcomes of 46 patients who underwent conization with iodoform gauze inside the vagina were observed. RESULTS The total postoperative infection rate after hysterectomy was 25.3% (43/170). The expression levels of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) in the cervical secretions and tissues were found to gradually increase, peaking at 2 weeks after conization, then significantly decreasing 3-6 weeks onwards. Compared with the 1-2-week group, the 4-5-week and 6-week groups exhibited significantly lower infection rates (2/42, 4.8%, 4-5-week group; 0%, 0/33, 6-week group; vs. 41/95, 43.2%, 1-2-week group; p<0.001). In the 1-2-week group in particular, the postoperative infection rate after laparoscopic hysterectomy was significantly higher than the rate after abdominal hysterectomy (21/35, 60% vs. 20/60, 33%, p=0.0177). In addition, the vaginal and cervical wound infection rates after conization in patients treated with iodoform were significantly lower than the rates in those without iodoform treatment (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS Hysterectomy should be performed at least 4 weeks after conization. Treatment with iodoform would be beneficial.

Indexed as

AdultCervix UteriChinaConizationFemaleHMGB1 ProteinHospitalsHumansHydrocarbons, IodinatedHysterectomyInterleukin-6Middle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsPostoperative PeriodRetrospective StudiesSurgical Wound InfectionHMGB1 ProteinHydrocarbons, IodinatedInterleukin-6iodoformTumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

Identifiers

PMID30547901
PMCPMC6302663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.