Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30547850›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2018

Phylogenetic analysis of Spirocerca lupi and Spirocerca vulpis reveal high genetic diversity and intra-individual variation.

Alicia Rojas, Eran Dvir, Róbert Farkas, Kalyan Sarma, Sonjoy Borthakur, Abdul Jabbar, Alex Markovics, Domenico Otranto, Gad Baneth

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. ElucidatingFrontiers in parasitology · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A Revised Phylogeny of thePlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  14. First report ofParasitology · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Alicia RojasKoret School of Veterinary Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot, Israel.
Eran DvirDepartment of Animal Sciences, Tel-Hai Academic College, Upper Galilee, Israel.
Róbert FarkasDepartment of Parasitology and Zoology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Budapest, Hungary.
Kalyan SarmaDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, College of Veterinary Sciences and Animal Husbandry, Central Agricultural University, Mizoram, India.
Sonjoy BorthakurDepartment of Veterinary Parasitology, College of Veterinary Sciences and Animal Husbandry, Central Agricultural University, Mizoram, India.
Abdul JabbarDepartment of Veterinary Biosciences, Melbourne Veterinary School, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Alex MarkovicsKimron Veterinary Institute, Bet Dagan, Israel.
Domenico OtrantoDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Bari, Valenzano, Italy.
Gad BanethKoret School of Veterinary Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot, Israel. gad.baneth@mail.huji.ac.il.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7549-1305
Central Agricultural University · INHebrew University of Jerusalem · ILMinistry of Agriculture and Rural Development · ILTel Hai Academic College · ILThe University of Melbourne · AUUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · ITUniversity of Veterinary Medicine · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSpirocerca lupi is a parasitic nematode of canids that can lead to a severe and potentially fatal disease. Recently, a new species, Spirocerca vulpis, was described from red foxes in Europe, suggesting a high genetic diversity of the Spirocerca spp. infecting canids. The genetic variation and phylogenetic relationships of S. lupi collected from naturally-infected domestic dogs from Australia, Hungary, Israel, Italy, India and South Africa, and S. vulpis from red foxes from Bosnia and Herzegovina, Italy and Spain, was studied using mitochondrial and rDNA markers.

resultsA high intra-individual variation was found in the first internal transcribed spacer (ITS1) locus in all Spirocerca spp., ranging between 0.37-2.84%, with up to six haplotypes per specimen. In addition, a combination of phylogenetic and haplotype analyses revealed a large variability between S. lupi specimens collected from different geographical locations using the ITS1 (0.37-9.33%) and the cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (cox1) gene (1.42-6.74%). This genetic diversity led to the identification of two S. lupi genotypes circulating among dogs (PTP support > 0.829), including genotype 1 found in S. lupi from Australia, India, Israel and South Africa, and genotype 2 represented by specimens from Hungary and Italy. These genotypes presented pairwise nucleotide distances of 0.14%, 8.06% and 6.48 ± 0.28% in the small rDNA subunit (18S), ITS1 and cox1 loci, respectively. Additionally, Nei's genetic distance in the ITS1 showed a further subdivision of genotype 1 worms into 1A (Israel and South Africa) and 1B (Australia and India). A morphological analysis of the anterior and posterior extremities of genotype 1 and genotype 2 worms using scanning electron microscopy did not show any differences between the specimens, contrary to the morphological differences between S. lupi and S. vulpis.

conclusionsThese findings demonstrate the high genetic variability among Spirocerca spp. from different geographical locations, thereby expanding our understanding of the epidemiology, evolution and phylogenetic variability within the genus.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationAnimalsAustraliaDNA, RibosomalDog DiseasesDogsFemaleFoxesGenotypeHaplotypesHungaryIndiaIsraelItalyMalePhylogenyDNA, Ribosomal18Scox1Genetic variationITS1Spirocerca lupiSpirocerca vulpis

Identifiers

PMID30547850
PMCPMC6295112
OpenAlexW2905542403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.